Cited by 16Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesHistorical Studies in Central AmericaArchaeological and Geological Studies

Sāmoan artefact provenance reveals limited artefact transfer within and beyond the archipelago

COCHRANE, ETHAN E., RIETH, TIMOTHY M.·2016·Archaeology in Oceania

Abstract

We summarise previous provenance research of Sāmoan lithic and ceramic artefacts, noting the timing and relative frequency of artefact transfers. Our summary suggests few intra‐ and extra‐archipelago artefact transfers for the first two millennia, but that these modestly increased in the last 800 years of the prehistoric sequence. The late distribution of Sāmoan basalt around the Pacific was spatially expansive, but proportionally small. These results have implications for explaining both the development of Polynesian society and basalt artefact exchange.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/arco.5090

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lithic artefacts were transferred rarely and in very small proportions within Sāmoa or beyond the archipelago for the first 1500 years of prehistory.

    “lithic artefacts were transferred rarely and in very small proportions within Sāmoa or beyond the archipelago for the first 1500 years of prehistory.”
  • Beginning about 1200 calBP, intra-archipelago transfers of basalts increased slightly in frequency and distance, and after another 300-400 years basalts from Sāmoa (particularly Tutuila) were transferred across the central and south-west Pacific, never comprising more than about 10% of a lithic assemblage except at Lapaha, Tonga.

    “Beginning about 1200 calBP, intra-archipelago transfers of basalts increase slightly in frequency and in distance, and after another 300-400 years, basalts from Sāmoa, particularly Tutuila, are transferred across the central and south-west Pacific, although they never comprise more than about 10% of a lithic assemblage, except at Lapaha, Tonga”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
COCHRANE, E. E., & RIETH, T. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • International Archaeological Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
COCHRANE, ETHAN E.
Venue
Archaeology in Oceania
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-10
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
150-157
ISSN
  • 0003-8121 (ISSN-L)
  • 0728-4896
  • 1834-4453
OpenAlex
W2314334300
Cited by
16
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Central America
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
artifact provenance, lithic artifacts, ceramic artifacts, Polynesian prehistory, prehistoric trade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review