Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: A population‐based study

Doran, Michele F., Crowson, Cynthia S., Pond, Gregory R., O'Fallon, W. Michael, Gabriel, Sherine E.·2002·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: A high frequency of infections complicating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been described in reports of case series. This retrospective longitudinal cohort study was undertaken to compare the frequency of infections in a population‐based incidence cohort of RA patients with that in a group of individuals without RA from the same population. Methods: RA patients included all members of an incidence cohort of Rochester, Minnesota residents ages ≥18 years who were first diagnosed as having RA between 1955 and 1994. One age‐ and sex‐matched subject without RA was selected for each patient with RA. Study subjects were followed up by review of their entire medical record until death, migration from the area, or study end (January 1, 2000), and details of all documented infections, along with information on potential risk factors for infection, were recorded. Hazard ratios for infections were estimated using stratified Andersen‐Gill proportional hazards models, with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: The 609 RA patients and 609 non‐RA study subjects (mean age 58.0 years; 73.1% female) were followed up for a mean of 12.7 years and 15.0 years, respectively, reflecting higher mortality among the group with RA. Hazards ratios for objectively confirmed infections, infections requiring hospitalization, and any documented infection in patients with RA were 1.70 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.42–2.03), 1.83 (95% CI 1.52–2.21), and 1.45 (95% CI 1.29–1.64), respectively, after adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, leukopenia, corticosteroid use, and diabetes mellitus. Sites of infection with the highest risk ratios were bone, joints, skin, soft tissues, and the respiratory tract. Conclusion: In this study, patients with RA were at increased risk of developing infections compared with non‐RA subjects. This may be due to immunomodulatory effects of RA, or to agents with immunosuppressive effects used in its treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.10524

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,214

Metadata

Authors
Doran, M. F., Crowson, C. S., Pond, G. R., O'Fallon, W. M., & Gabriel, S. E.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
2287-2293
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2085947993
Cited by
1,214
References
2
FWCI
14.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: A population‐based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10524
The paper
Doran, M. F., Crowson, C. S., Pond, G. R., O'Fallon, W. M., & Gabriel, S. E. (2002). Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: A population‐based study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10524

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.