Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of naproxen and acetaminophen in a two‐year study of treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee

James Williams, H., Ward, John R., Egger, Marlene J., Neuner, Rosemarie, Brooks, Raye H., Clegg, Daniel O., Field, Elizabeth H., Skosey, John L., Alarcón, Graciela S., Willkens, Robert F., Paulus, Harold E., Jon Russell, I., Sharp, John T.·1993·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective. To compare the relative safety and efficacy of naproxen and acetaminophen in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The major outcome measures were radiographic progression and withdrawal from the trial due to lack of efficacy. Methods. One hundred seventy‐eight patients with OA of the knee were enrolled in a 2‐year prospective, controlled, double‐blind multicenter trial and were randomly assigned to receive acetaminophen (ACT) or naproxen (NPX) treatment. Results. After 6 weeks of treatment, modest improvement in pain on motion and in physician's global assessment was seen in both the ACT and the NPX groups, and the NPX group also had modest improvement in pain at rest and in 50‐foot walk time. Sixty‐two patients completed the 2‐year study. Among these patients, radiographic progression was similar in the 2 treatment groups. Withdrawal from the trial due to lack of drug efficacy was slightly more frequent among patients in the ACT group (22% versus 16%), but withdrawal due to adverse drug effects was slightly more common in the NPX group (23% versus 18%). Conclusion. The efficacy of ACT treatment and NPX treatment was similar, although it was slightly better for NPX. The toxicity rate was slightly lower with ACT. However, the high rate of withdrawal in both treatment groups suggests that neither is satisfactory for the treatment of OA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1780360904

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
James Williams, H., Ward, J. R., Egger, M. J., Neuner, R., Brooks, R. H., Clegg, D. O., Field, E. H., Skosey, J. L., Alarcón, G. S., Willkens, R. F., Paulus, H. E., Jon Russell, I., & Sharp, J. T.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-09
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
1196-1206
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2076657068
Cited by
262
References
2
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of naproxen and acetaminophen in a two‐year study of treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780360904
The paper
James Williams, H., Ward, J. R., Egger, M. J., Neuner, R., Brooks, R. H., Clegg, D. O., Field, E. H., Skosey, J. L., Alarcón, G. S., Willkens, R. F., Paulus, H. E., Jon Russell, I., & Sharp, J. T. (1993). Comparison of naproxen and acetaminophen in a two‐year study of treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780360904

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.