Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protective effect of hydroxychloroquine on renal damage in patients with lupus nephritis: LXV, data from a multiethnic US cohort

Open access
Pons‐Estel, Guillermo J., Alarcón, Graciela S., McGwin, Gerald, Danila, Maria I., Zhang, Jie, Bastian, Holly M., Reveille, John D., Vilá, Luis M.·2009·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether hydroxychloroquine can delay renal damage development in lupus nephritis patients. Methods: Lupus nephritis patients (n = 256) from the LUpus in MInorities, NAture versus nurture study (n = 635), a multiethnic cohort of African Americans, Hispanics, and Caucasians, age ≥16 years with disease duration ≤5 years at baseline (T0) were studied. Renal damage was defined using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (≥1 of the following lasting at least 6 months: estimated/measured glomerular filtration rate <50%, 24‐hour proteinuria ≥3.5 gm and/or end‐stage renal disease, regardless of dialysis or transplantation). Patients with renal damage before T0 were excluded (n = 53). The association between hydroxychloroquine use and renal damage (as defined, or omitting proteinuria) was estimated using Cox proportional regression analyses adjusting for potential confounders. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves based on hydroxychloroquine intake or the World Health Organization (WHO) class glomerulonephritis were also derived. Results: Sixty‐three (31.0%) of the 203 patients included developed renal damage over a mean ± SD disease duration of 5.2 ± 3.5 years. The most frequent renal damage domain item was proteinuria. Patients who received hydroxychloroquine (79.3%) exhibited a lower frequency of WHO class IV glomerulonephritis, had lower disease activity, and received lower glucocorticoid doses than those who did not take hydroxychloroquine. After adjusting for confounders, hydroxychloroquine was protective of renal damage occurrence in full (hazard ratio [HR] 0.12, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.02–0.97, P = 0.0464) and reduced (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13–0.68, P = 0.0043) models. Omitting proteinuria provided comparable results. The cumulative probability of renal damage occurrence was higher in those who did not take hydroxychloroquine and those classified as WHO class IV glomerulonephritis (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: After adjusting for possible confounding factors, the protective effect of hydroxychloroquine in retarding renal damage occurrence in systemic lupus erythematosus is still evident.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.24538

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Pons‐Estel, G. J., Alarcón, G. S., McGwin, G., Danila, M. I., Zhang, J., Bastian, H. M., Reveille, J. D., & Vilá, L. M.
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-28
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
830-839
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W2015040567
Cited by
306
References
49
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protective effect of hydroxychloroquine on renal damage in patients with lupus nephritis: LXV, data from a multiethnic US cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.24538
The paper
Pons‐Estel, G. J., Alarcón, G. S., McGwin, G., Danila, M. I., Zhang, J., Bastian, H. M., Reveille, J. D., & Vilá, L. M. (2009). Protective effect of hydroxychloroquine on renal damage in patients with lupus nephritis: LXV, data from a multiethnic US cohort. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24538

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.