Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III Study

Genovese, Mark C., Fleischmann, Roy, Kivitz, Alan J., Rell‐Bakalarska, Maria, Martincova, Renata, Fiore, Stefano, Rohane, Patricia, van Hoogstraten, Hubert, Garg, Anju, Fan, Chunpeng, van Adelsberg, Janet, Weinstein, Steven P., Graham, Neil M. H., Stahl, Neil, Yancopoulos, George D., Huizinga, Tom W. J., van der Heijde, Désirée·2015·Arthritis & Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Adults with moderate‐to‐severe RA and an inadequate response to MTX were randomized (1:1:1) to receive sarilumab (doses of 150 mg or 200 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks in conjunction with weekly MTX for 52 weeks. Co–primary end points were the proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) improvement responses at week 24, change from baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI) at week 16, and change from baseline in the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) of radiographic damage at week 52. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among the groups. For all 3 co–primary end points, the sarilumab 150 mg and 200 mg groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements as compared with the placebo group (ACR20 response rate at week 24, 58.0%, 66.4%, and 33.4%, respectively [P < 0.0001]; least squares mean change in HAQ DI at week 16, −0.53, −0.55, and −0.29, respectively [P < 0.0001]; and mean change in SHS at week 52, 0.90, 0.25, and 2.78, respectively [P < 0.0001]). The most common treatment‐emergent adverse event was infection. In the sarilumab 150 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, and placebo groups, the incidence of serious infections was 2.6%, 4.0%, and 2.3%, respectively. Elevations in alanine aminotransferase levels >3‐fold the upper limit of normal occurred in 9.5%, 8.0%, and 2.1% of patients, respectively; in 24 patients, this led to discontinuation of treatment. Elevated total cholesterol levels were observed in 36.8%, 43.0%, and 18.3% of patients, respectively. In patients receiving 150 mg and 200 mg sarilumab, neutrophil counts of 0.5 to <1.0 × 10 9/liter were observed in 5.1% and 7.8% of patients, respectively, while neutrophil counts of <0.5 × 10 9/liter were observed in 0.9% and 0.7% of patients, respectively; none of the patients receiving placebo experienced changes in neutrophil counts. Conclusion: In RA patients treated with sarilumab (150 mg or 200 mg every 2 weeks) in combination with MTX, both doses provided sustained clinical efficacy, as shown by significant improvements in symptomatic, functional, and radiographic outcomes. Sarilumab was generally well tolerated. The adverse events observed in this study were consistent with the effects of interleukin‐6 signaling blockade.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.39093

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Patient disposition in the MOBILITY study part B over 62 weeks, with 4 weeks of screening, 52 weeks of treatment, and 6 weeks of posttreatment followup. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were randomized to receive sarilumab every 2 weeks (q2w) or placebo, in conjunction with weekly methotrexate. * 5 Selected doses only. † 5 From week 16 onward, patients who did not achieve a $ 20% improvement from baseline in the swollen joint count or tender joint count at 2 consecutive assessments were offered rescue therapy with open-label sarilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks. ‡ 5 Other discontinuations included poor compliance with protocol, patient choice/preference, use of any biologic agents, or any treatment unblinding. AEs 5 adverse events; LoE 5 lack of efficacy.
Figure 1 Patient disposition in the MOBILITY study part B over 62 weeks, with 4 weeks of screening, 52 weeks of treatment, and 6 weeks of posttreatment followup. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were randomized to receive sarilumab every 2 weeks (q2w) or placebo, in conjunction with weekly methotrexate. * 5 Selected doses only. † 5 From week 16 onward, patients who did not achieve a $ 20% improvement from baseline in the swollen joint count or tender joint count at 2 consecutive assessments were offered rescue therapy with open-label sarilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks. ‡ 5 Other discontinuations included poor compliance with protocol, patient choice/preference, use of any biologic agents, or any treatment unblinding. AEs 5 adverse events; LoE 5 lack of efficacy.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 3 Mean change from baseline in radiographic progression of structural damage (total modified Sharp/van der Heijde score [SHS], erosion score, and joint space narrowing score) at week 24 and week 52 in the placebo plus methotrexate (MTX), sarilumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) plus MTX, and sarilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks plus MTX groups (A) , and cumulative probability of change in the SHS at week 52 (B) . Results are from the intent-to-treat population (data from patients after treatment discontinuation or initiation of rescue therapy are not included).
Figure 3 Mean change from baseline in radiographic progression of structural damage (total modified Sharp/van der Heijde score [SHS], erosion score, and joint space narrowing score) at week 24 and week 52 in the placebo plus methotrexate (MTX), sarilumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) plus MTX, and sarilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks plus MTX groups (A) , and cumulative probability of change in the SHS at week 52 (B) . Results are from the intent-to-treat population (data from patients after treatment discontinuation or initiation of rescue therapy are not included).CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1093/rheumatology/kes278 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/acr.21641 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204573 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rheumatology.a031496 · DOI
  5. Simsek I., 2010, TNF inhibitors: new and old agents for rheumatoid arthritis, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 68, 204
  6. Singh JA, 2012, Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults: an update, J Manag Care Pharm, 18, S1
  7. 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.8 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1177/1759720X10378372 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00296-006-0143-2 · DOI
  10. 10.1097/00124743-199504000-00006 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1323896111 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1324022111 · DOI
  13. 10.1136/ard.2008.092932 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1136/ard.2008.105197 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/art.30158 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200395 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60453-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204405 · DOI
  19. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2360 · DOI
  20. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1148 · DOI
  21. 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2012-2723 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/art.1780310302 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/art.1780360601 · DOI
  24. Heijde DM, 1999, . How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method [corrected and republished in J Rheumatol 2000;27:261–3], J Rheumatol, 26, 743
  25. 10.1002/art.1780380602 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/art.1780230202 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/art.1780380107 · DOI
  28. 10.1186/ar1740 · DOI
  29. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203843 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.202 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/art.37816 · DOI
  32. 10.1136/ard.2010.146043 · DOI
  33. Aletaha D, 2005, The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis, Clin Exp Rheumatol, 23, S100
  34. 10.1093/rheumatology/kes113 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.08.001 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/art.38779 · DOI
  37. 10.3899/jrheum.100717 · DOI
  38. 10.1001/2012.jama.10857 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/pst.1622 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/pst.1619 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/rheumatology/keq343 · DOI
  42. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204760 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200704 · DOI
  44. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205137 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Genovese, M. C., Fleischmann, R., Kivitz, A. J., Rell‐Bakalarska, M., Martincova, R., Fiore, S., Rohane, P., van Hoogstraten, H., Garg, A., Fan, C., van Adelsberg, J., Weinstein, S. P., Graham, N. M. H., Stahl, N., Yancopoulos, G. D., Huizinga, T. W. J., & van der Heijde, D.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University Medical Center Palo Alto California
  • Metroplex Clinical Research Center Dallas Texas
  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research Duncansville Pennsylvania
  • Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Outpatient Clinic Warsaw Poland
  • Sanofi Prague Czech Republic
  • Sanofi Bridgewater New Jersey
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Tarrytown New York
  • Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden The Netherlands
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-25
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
1424-1437
ISSN
  • 2326-5191
  • 2326-5205
Cited by
219
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Regeneron

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.39093
The paper
Genovese, M. C., Fleischmann, R., Kivitz, A. J., Rell‐Bakalarska, M., Martincova, R., Fiore, S., Rohane, P., van Hoogstraten, H., Garg, A., Fan, C., van Adelsberg, J., Weinstein, S. P., Graham, N. M. H., Stahl, N., Yancopoulos, G. D., Huizinga, T. W. J., & van der Heijde, D. (2015). Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III Study. Arthritis & Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39093