Cited by 363Anatomy and Medical TechnologySocial Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical Education

YouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education

Jaffar, Akram Abood·2012·Anatomical Sciences Education

Abstract

The use of online social networks in medical education can remodel and enhance anatomy teaching and learning; one such network is the video-sharing site YouTube. Limited research in the literature exists on the use of YouTube as a platform for anatomy education. The aim of this study is to assess student's perceptions and patterns of usage of this resource, as well as the effectiveness of YouTube videos within a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. The study was conducted on 91 second-year medical students for whom video links were suggested throughout the academic year. In addition, the Human Anatomy Education (HAE) Channel was launched on YouTube to support classroom teaching with videos that emphasized applied aspects of anatomy. The results demonstrated that 98% of the students used YouTube as an online information resource, albeit in different frequencies. Out of the 86% who have been to the HAE Channel, 92% agreed/strongly agreed that the channel helped them learn anatomy. The study also reports the popularity of and awareness about using YouTube as a social network as well as in learning. Based on these findings, YouTube can be considered as an effective tool to enhance anatomy instruction if the videos are scrutinized, diversified, and aimed toward course objectives. Faculty of average computer literacy should be enabled to produce videos on their own YouTube channels to support independent learning and integration in a PBL curriculum. The methods described for ca…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ase.1268

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • YouTube as video streaming media can promote students' engagements in science lessons.

    “The use of video streaming media, such as YouTube (http://www.youtube.com), in the classroom learning is important to be considered as an alternative educational tool to promote students' engagements in science lessons (Jaffar, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaffar, A. A.
Affiliations
University of Sharjah (AE)
Corresponding author
Jaffar, Akram Abood
Venue
Anatomical Sciences Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
158-164
ISSN
  • 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-9780
OpenAlex
W1990577453
Cited by
360
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anatomical Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sharjah
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
YouTube, anatomy education, online video platforms, social networking sites, problem-based learning, medical students, student perceptions, self-directed learning, clinical anatomy
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Attitude to Computers, Audiovisual Aids, Awareness, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Perception, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, United Arab Emirates, Video Recording, Program Evaluation, Problem-Based Learning, Internet, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review