The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century
Abstract
Anatomical education has been undergoing reforms in line with the demands of medical profession. The aim of the present study is to assess the impact of a traditional method like cadaveric dissection in teaching/learning anatomy at present times when medical schools are inclining towards student‐centered, integrated, clinical application models. The article undertakes a review of literature and analyzes the observations made therein reflecting on the relevance of cadaveric dissection in anatomical education of 21st century. Despite the advent of modern technology and evolved teaching methods, dissection continues to remain a cornerstone of anatomy curriculum. Medical professionals of all levels believe that dissection enables learning anatomy with relevant clinical correlates. Moreover dissection helps to build discipline independent skills which are essential requirements of modern health care setup. It has been supplemented by other teaching/learning methods due to limited availability of cadavers in some countries. However, in the developing world due to good access to cadavers, dissection based teaching is central to anatomy education till date. Its utility is also reflected in the perception of students who are of the opinion that dissection provides them with a foundation critical to development of clinical skills. Researchers have even suggested that time has come to reinstate dissection as the core method of teaching gross anatomy to ensure safe medical practice. Nevertheless, as dissection alone cannot provide uniform learning experience hence needs to be complemented with other innovative learning methods in the future education model of anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 10: 286–299. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of google trends in health care research: a systematic review
Nuti, S. V., Wayda, B., Ranasinghe, I., Wang, S., Dreyer, R. P., Chen, S. I., & Murugiah, K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 · Cited by 1,086
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444 · Cited by 1,000 · cited 1×
“An effectively prepared PPT can not only be graphically impressive, but also worthwhile in terms of creating interest among the students (Mayer and Anderson, 1992).”
BackgroundYouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education
Jaffar, A. A. (2012) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1268 · Cited by 360
Professionalism and anatomy: how do these two terms define our role?
Pawlina, W. (2006) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.20329 · Cited by 70
Cited by
Iwanaga, J., Loukas, M., Dumont, A. S., & Tubbs, R. S. (2021) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.23655 · Cited by 328
Teaching, Learning and Assessing Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence: The Road to a Better Future
Abdellatif, H., Al Mushaiqri, M., Albalushi, H., Al-Zaabi, A. A., Roychoudhury, S., & Das, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192114209 · Cited by 120
Nursing students' experiences and perceptions of an anatomy laboratory session: Mixed methods study
Asman, O., Kagan, I., & Itzhaki, M. (2022) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2106 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghosh, S. K.
- Venue
- Anatomical Sciences Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-08-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 286-299
- ISSN
- 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-9780
- OpenAlex
- W2513713668
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ase.1649
- The paper
- Ghosh, S. K. (2017). Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1649
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.