The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A novel three‐dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomy
Open accessAbstract
Three‐dimensional (3D) visualization of neuroanatomy can be challenging for medical students. This knowledge is essential in order for students to correlate cross‐sectional neuroanatomy and whole brain specimens within neuroscience curricula and to interpret clinical and radiological information as clinicians or researchers. This study implemented and evaluated a new tool for teaching 3D neuroanatomy to first‐year medical students at Boston University School of Medicine. Students were randomized into experimental and control classrooms. All students were taught neuroanatomy according to traditional 2D methods. Then, during laboratory review, the experimental group constructed 3D color‐coded physical models of the periventricular structures, while the control group re‐examined 2D brain cross‐sections. At the end of the course, 2D and 3D spatial relationships of the brain and preferred learning styles were assessed in both groups. The overall quiz scores for the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group (t(85) = 2.02, P < 0.05). However, when the questions were divided into those requiring either 2D or 3D visualization, only the scores for the 3D questions were significantly higher in the experimental group (F1,85= 5.48, P = 0.02). When surveyed, 84% of students recommended repeating the 3D activity for future laboratories, and this preference was equally distributed across preferred learning styles (χ 2 = 0.14, n.s.). Our results suggest that our 3D physical modeling activity is an effective method for teaching spatial relationships of brain anatomy and will better prepare students for visualization of 3D neuroanatomy, a skill essential for higher education in neuroscience, neurology, and neurosurgery. Anat Sci Educ. © 2010 American Association of Anatomists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
American Medical Education 100 Years after the Flexner Report
Cooke, M., Irby, D. M., Sullivan, W., & Ludmerer, K. M. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra055445 · Cited by 883
How medical students learn spatial anatomy
Garg, A. X., Norman, G., & Sperotable, L. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03649-7 · Cited by 351
Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning?
Garg, A., Norman, G. R., Spero, L., & Maheshwari, P. (1999) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199910000-00049 · Cited by 183
Cited by
The production of anatomical teaching resources using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology
McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., McHenry, C. R., & Adams, J. W. (2014) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1475 · Cited by 698
Metadata
- Authors
- Estevez, M. E., Lindgren, K. A., & Bergethon, P. R.
- Venue
- Anatomical Sciences Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-11
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 309-317
- ISSN
- 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-9780
- OpenAlex
- W2097445625
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel three‐dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ase.186
- The paper
- Estevez, M. E., Lindgren, K. A., & Bergethon, P. R. (2010). A novel three‐dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.