Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of visual–spatial ability on medical students' performance in a gross anatomy course

Lufler, Rebecca S., Zumwalt, Ann C., Romney, Carla A., Hoagland, Todd M.·2012·Anatomical Sciences Education

Abstract

The ability to mentally manipulate objects in three dimensions is essential to the practice of many clinical medical specialties. The relationship between this type of visual–spatial ability and performance in preclinical courses such as medical gross anatomy is poorly understood. This study determined if visual–spatial ability is associated with performance on practical examinations, and if students' visual–spatial ability improves during medical gross anatomy. Three hundred and fifty‐two first‐year medical students completed the Mental Rotations Test (MRT) before the gross anatomy course and 255 at its completion in 2008 and 2009. Hypotheses were tested using logistic regression analysis and Student's t‐test. Compared with students in the lowest quartile of the MRT, students who scored in the highest quartile of the MRT were 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 and 3.8] and 2.1 (95% CI 1.2 and 3.5) times more likely to score greater than 90% on practical examinations and on both practical and written examinations, respectively. MRT scores for males and females increased significantly (P < 0.0001). Measurement of students' pre‐existing visual–spatial ability is predictive of performance in medical gross anatomy, and early intervention may be useful for students with low visual–spatial ability on entry to medical school. Participation in medical gross anatomy increases students' visual–spatial ability, although the mechanism for this phenomenon is unknown. Anat Sci Educ. © 2011 American Association of Anatomists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ase.264

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Lufler, R. S., Zumwalt, A. C., Romney, C. A., & Hoagland, T. M.
Venue
Anatomical Sciences Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-29
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
3-9
ISSN
  • 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-9780
OpenAlex
W1967611396
Cited by
169
References
3
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of visual–spatial ability on medical students' performance in a gross anatomy course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ase.264
The paper
Lufler, R. S., Zumwalt, A. C., Romney, C. A., & Hoagland, T. M. (2012). Effect of visual–spatial ability on medical students' performance in a gross anatomy course. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.264

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.