Cited by 545Spatial Cognition and NavigationCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis

Baenninger, Maryann, Newcombe, Nora·1989·Sex Roles

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00287729

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
1989-03
Volume
20
Issue
5-6
Pages
327-344
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W1995246042
Cited by
545
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
spatial ability, sex differences, spatial experience, spatial training, training effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review