The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective
Open accessAbstract
An extensive analysis of the presence of different altmetric indicators provided by Altmetric.com across scientific fields is presented, particularly focusing on their relationship with citations. Our results confirm that the presence and density of social media altmetric counts are still very low and not very frequent among scientific publications, with 15%–24% of the publications presenting some altmetric activity and concentrated on the most recent publications, although their presence is increasing over time. Publications from the social sciences, humanities, and the medical and life sciences show the highest presence of altmetrics, indicating their potential value and interest for these fields. The analysis of the relationships between altmetrics and citations confirms previous claims of positive correlations but is relatively weak, thus supporting the idea that altmetrics do not reflect the same kind of impact as citations. Also, altmetric counts do not always present a better filtering of highly‐cited publications than journal citation scores. Altmetric scores (particularly mentions in blogs) are able to identify highly‐cited publications with higher levels of precision than journal citation scores ( JCS ), but they have a lower level of recall. The value of altmetrics as a complementary tool of citation analysis is highlighted, although more research is suggested to disentangle the potential meaning and value of altmetric indicators for research evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A recent study by Costas et al. also found that Altmetrics coverage of Mathematical and Computer Science papers tends to be much lower than disciplines like Biomedicine and Health or Natural Sciences and engineering [29].”
From Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements (2017) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Seglen, P. O. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 · Cited by 2,447
Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 · Cited by 907
The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation
Waltman, L., Calero‐Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E., Tijssen, R., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., van Raan, A. F. J., Visser, M. S., & Wouters, P. F. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22708 · Cited by 452
Self-citationTowards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001 · Cited by 438
Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature
Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M. A., & Larivière, V. (2013) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23101 · Cited by 434
Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. F. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1264-0 · Cited by 386
Self-citationAltmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impactPreprint
Priem, J. R., Piwowar, H., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1203.4745 · Cited by 360
Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. A. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2 · Cited by 276
Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article‐level discussion and metrics
Adie, E. A., & William, R. O. E. (2012) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1087/20130103 · Cited by 224
Shema, H., Bar‐Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. A. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23037 · Cited by 209
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bar‐Ilan J.(2012).JASIST@ Mendeley. Presented at ACM Web Science Conference Workshop on Altmetrics Evanston IL 21 June 2012. Retrieved from:http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/bar‐ilan/
- Piwowar H., 2013, Value all research products, Nature, 493, 2013
- Schmidt M.(2012).Development and evaluation of a match key for linking references to cited articles. InProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators Montréal; Science‐Metrix and OST Volume 2(pp.707–718).
- Zahedi Z., 2013, Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Vienna, Austria, 876
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 711
Altmetrics: “big data” that map the influence of New Zealand research
Konkiel, S., & Guichard, S. (2018) · Library Hi Tech News · doi:10.1108/lhtn-04-2018-0021 · Cited by 3
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., Uzzi, B., et al. (2021) · Bibliosphere · doi:10.20913/1815-3186-2021-1-25-42 · Cited by 3
4 Migration research and analysis: Growth, reach and recent contributions
(2020) · World Migration Report · doi:10.1002/wom3.14 · Cited by 3
Zong, Q., Huang, Z., Deng, Z., Deng, W., Xie, Y., & Yu, Y. (2023) · Serials Review · doi:10.1080/00987913.2023.2234242 · Cited by 3
Prasetyawan, Y. Y. (2018) · Anuva Jurnal Kajian Budaya Perpustakaan dan Informasi · doi:10.14710/anuva.2.1.1-9 · Cited by 3
Attention-Based Multi-fusion Method for Citation Prediction
Wang, J., Zhang, F., Li, Y., & Liu, D. (2019) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-9714-1_35 · Cited by 3
Do 'altmetric mentions' follow Power Laws? Evidence from social media mention data in Altmetric.comPreprint
Banshal, S. K., Basu, A., Singh, V. K., Gupta, S., & Muhuri, P. K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.09079 · Cited by 4
Selective tweeting of COVID-19 articles: Does title or abstract positivity influence dissemination?Preprint
Fabiano, N., Hallgrimson, Z., Wong, S., Salameh, J., Kazi, S., Unni, R. R., Treanor, L. M., Frank, R., Prager, R. T., & McInnes, M. D. F. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.06.22.21259354 · Cited by 3
Alternative metrics and social impact of research about Social Sciences in Cuba
Núñez, R. O., & Castrillón, É. J. (2024) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvae043 · Cited by 2
Chandragiri, S. S., Baral, B., Hammerle, F. P., Litvinova, O., Opriessnig, E., Matin, M., Mondal, H., Mickael, M., Kletečka-Pulker, M., Atanasov, A. G., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1622983 · Cited by 2
Do novel papers attract more social attention?
Cheng, J., Xie, Y., & Wu, Q. (2025) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2025.101710 · Cited by 3
Wang, J. J., Wei, S., & Ye, F. Y. (2025) · Journal of Data and Information Science · doi:10.2478/jdis-2025-0040 · Cited by 2
Sentiment analysis of research attention: the Altmetric proof of concept
Areia, C. M., Taylor, M., Garcia, M., & Hernandez, J. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2025.1612216 · Cited by 2
Amiri, M., & Sotudeh, H. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05477-x · Cited by 2
Transparency and Reproducibility: Potential Solutions
Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.007 · Cited by 2
Nagarajan, A., Raamkumar, A. S., Erdt, M., Vijayakumar, H., Luo, F., Zheng, H., & Theng, Y. L. (2021) · Journal of Altmetrics · doi:10.29024/joa.36 · Cited by 2
Moreira, P. S. D. C., & Tsunoda, D. F. (2021) · Em Questão · doi:10.19132/1808-5245281.209-233 · Cited by 2
Could the altmetrics wave bring a flood of confusion for anatomists?
Byram, J. N., Lazarus, M. D., Wilson, A. B., & Brown, K. (2023) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2267 · Cited by 2
Atenção on-line do artigo “Information as thing” de Michael K. Buckland
Gontijo, M. C. A., & de Araújo, R. F. (2021) · Ciência da Informação Express · doi:10.60144/v2i.2021.88 · Cited by 2
Chingath, V., & Babu, H. R. (2024) · Journal of Data Science Informetrics and Citation Studies · doi:10.5530/jcitation.3.1.5 · Cited by 2
Zhang, L., & Ma, L. (2024) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05032-0 · Cited by 2
Coverage of the research documents with top altmetric attention scores in online news
Nabavi, M. (2024) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-12-2022-0666 · Cited by 2
Sharp, M. K., Logullo, P., Murphy, P., Baral, P., Burke, S., Grimes, D. R., Ryan, M., & Clyne, B. (2024) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13895.2 · Cited by 2
Altmetric.com or PlumX : Does it matter?
Rasuli, B., & Nabavi, M. (2024) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1631 · Cited by 6
Mamavi, O., & Zerbib, R. (2021) · La Revue des sciences de gestion/La Revue des sciences de gestion, Direction et gestion · doi:10.3917/rsg.309.0052 · Cited by 2
Noakes, T., Uys, C. S., Harpur, P., & van Zyl, I. (2025) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2024.1431298 · Cited by 2
Taşkın, Z. (2025) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24982 · Cited by 6
Hussain, S., Chowdhury, R., Sharhan, Y., Almhanedi, H., Alterki, M., Alterki, A., & Abdelwahab, M. (2025) · Sleep And Breathing · doi:10.1007/s11325-025-03274-7 · Cited by 2
Relationship between Altmetric scores and traditional metrics in the anesthesiology literature
Chu, J. H. Y., Shin, S., Lin, X.-W., & Jones, P. M. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-025-03065-4 · Cited by 2
The relationship between altmetric score with received citations in Iranian pediatrics articles
Nemati‐Anaraki, L., Koupaei, H. A., & Alibeyk, M. (2017) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.12020.1 · Cited by 2
The Growth of Dental Implant Literature from 1966 to 2016: A Bibliometric Analysis
Yeung, A. W. K., & Leung, W. K. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.77223 · Cited by 2
Paving the Way for Science 2.0: Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches
Vignoli, M., Kraker, P., & Sevault, A. (2015) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.1943.0569 · Cited by 3
Gerring, J., Karcher, S., & Apfeld, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.015 · Cited by 3
Where and how knowledge on digital library evaluation spreads: a case study on conference literature
Papachristopoulos, L., Mitrelis, A., Tsakonas, G., & Papatheodorou, C. (2014) · Νημερτής · Cited by 2
Hajar, S., Mazarei, Z., & Mirzabeigi, M. (2015) · Journal of Information Processing and Management · Cited by 2
Raamkumar, A. S., Foo, S. S.-B., & Pang, N. L.-S. (2017) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-06-2016-0072 · Cited by 2
Comment to: Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies?
Shu, F. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2504-x · Cited by 2
Altmetrics, Legacy Scholarship, and Scholarly Legacy
Collister, L., & Taylor, A. L. (2017) · Pennsylvania Libraries Research & Practice · doi:10.5195/palrap.2017.154 · Cited by 2
González-Fernández-Villavicencio, N., & Moya-Orozco, V. M. (2018) · Anales de Documentación · doi:10.6018/analesdoc.21.1.303221 · Cited by 2
D’Este, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., & Robinson‐García, N. (2019) · DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · Cited by 2
What’s Wrong with Replicating the Old Boys’ Networks?
Teele, D. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.016 · Cited by 2
Which are the tools available for scholars?
Ferreira, M., Ríos, D. F., & Candia, N. B. (2019) · Reportes científicos de la FACEN · doi:10.18004/rcfacen.2019.10.2.112 · Cited by 2
Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2020) · Scholarly Assessment Reports · doi:10.29024/sar.20 · Cited by 3
Self-citationMeasuring the social impact of contemporary dysphagia research: an altmetric analysis
Coyne, M., & Regan, J. (2021) · Speech Language and Hearing · doi:10.1080/2050571x.2021.1926626 · Cited by 5
Lin, Y.-C., Liu, C., & Chiu, W.-H. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Social Sciences and Intelligence Management (SSIM) · doi:10.1109/ssim49526.2021.9555189 · Cited by 2
Gerring, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.013 · Cited by 2
Lieberman, E. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.003 · Cited by 2
Physiological Reports: Standing openly for sound science
Adams, J. C. (2022) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.14814/phy2.15532 · Cited by 2
Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2018) · 2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.26803/myres.2018.23 · Cited by 2
Zhang, J., & Hou, J. (2023) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515231174387 · Cited by 2
Altmetrics is an indication of quality research or just HOT Topic
Wee, J., & Chia, Y. B. (2014) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · Cited by 2
TWEETS OF AN ARTICLE AND ITS CITATION: AN ALTMETRIC STUDY OF MOST PROLIFIC AUTHORS
Ravikumar, S., & Khonglam, B. (2018) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 2
Repercusión altmétrica y tipo de acceso en artículos peruanos de Ciencias Sociales
Alhuay‐Quispe, J., & Bautista-Ynofuente, L. (2021) · Investigación Bibliotecológica Archivonomía Bibliotecología e Información · doi:10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2021.89.58369 · Cited by 2
The impact of open access on the medical literature: a review of current literature
Turk, N. (2017) · Slovenian Medical Journal · doi:10.6016/zdravvestn.2463 · Cited by 2
A task-based scientific paper recommender system for literature review and manuscript preparation
Raamkumar, A. S. (2018) · doi:10.32657/10220/46243 · Cited by 2
Convergence and Inequality in Research GlobalizationPreprint
Mishra, S., & Wang, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.02052 · Cited by 2
Çelebi, A. R. C., Bulut, E., Köprübaşı, S., & Dokur, M. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1021430/v1 · Cited by 2
The Altmetrics Hot 100: What Are the Most Influential Articles in Criminology and Criminal Justice?
Corey, J., & Sanders, W. (2023) · Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/10439862231170949 · Cited by 1
Wijewickrema, M. (2024) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1618 · Cited by 1
Li, Y., Song, N., Shen, Y., & Pei, L. (2024) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2024.101584 · Cited by 2
Public interest in science or bots? Selective amplification of scientific articles on Twitter
Rahman, A., Mohammadi, E., & Alhoori, H. (2024) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-01-2024-0050 · Cited by 1
Kerin, A., Ledingham, C., Davey, M. S., O’Dwyer, L., & Cassidy, J. T. (2025) · Journal of Orthopaedic Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100536 · Cited by 1
Erkmen, B., Durna, Y. M., Şahin, Ş., Duymaz, Y. K., & Bahşi̇, İ. (2025) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000011420 · Cited by 1
Social media uptake of scientific journals: A comparison between X and WeChat
Cong, T., Zheng, E.-T., Han, Z., Fang, Z., & Costas, R. (2025) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515251359759 · Cited by 1
Self-citationAnalysis of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Metrics-Altmetrics Score Perspective: HEMS-MAP
Çetin, M., Onur, D., Bayram, B., BIÇAKÇI, S., Çanakçı, M. E., İmamoğlu, M., Kuas, Ç., Motov, S. M., Long, B., & Gottlieb, M. A. (2025) · Air Medical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.amj.2025.07.008 · Cited by 1
Atenção online da produção científica dos repositórios institucionais brasileiros
SANTOS, R. C. C. D., & de Araújo, R. F. (2025) · Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.5195/biblios.2025.1303 · Cited by 1
Peer-Review, Bibliometrie, Altmetrics – gibt es einen Königsweg bei Evaluierungen?
Mittermaier, B. (2026) · Ubiquity Press eBooks · doi:10.5334/bdh.h · Cited by 1
Yu, S., & Chen, K. (2025) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-025-00557-8 · Cited by 2
Gromova, A., Šuriņa, S., Seņkāne, S., Ortega, J. L., Melngalve, D., & Mārtinsone, K. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102408 · Cited by 3
The Development and Drivers of the Impact Advantages of Open Access Research
Taylor, M. (2026) · Goodfellow Publishers Ltd eBooks · doi:10.23912/open_access_implications · Cited by 1
Hazarika, H. J., & Konch, P. K. (2026) · Serials Review · doi:10.1080/00987913.2026.2638754 · Cited by 1
Sušnjak, T., Palffy, C., Zimina, T., Altynbekova, N., Garg, K., & Gilbert, L. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05681-3 · Cited by 1
A graphical article-level metric for intuitive comparison of large-scale literatures
Ling, X., Liu, Y., Huang, Z., Shah, P. K., & Li, C. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1782-4 · Cited by 1
Automated arxiv feeds on twitter: On the role of bots in scholarly communication
Larivière, V. (2014) · Cited by 1
Availability of altmetrics for articles in Japanese society journals
Sato, S., & Yoshida, M. (2017) · Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi · doi:10.2964/jsik_2017_009 · Cited by 1
Nolasco, D., & Oliveira, J. (2018) · Very Large Data Bases · Cited by 1
Nix, T., Smith, J., & Song, J. Y. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809969-8.00022-x · Cited by 2
Maull, K. E., & Mayernik, M. S. (2019) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-78973-269-620191002 · Cited by 1
Библиотека в условиях информационной экосистемы открытой науки
Redkina, N. S. (2021) · Научно- техническая информация Серия 1 Организация и методика информационной работы · doi:10.36535/0548-0019-2021-10-2 · Cited by 1
Gibson, D. J., Austin, A. T., Bardgett, R. D., Rees, M., Baier, A., & Sandhu, L. (2015) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12352 · Cited by 1
An Expanded Bibliometric Study of Articles on Emerging Markets
Dodevska, Z. (2022) · Management Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies · doi:10.7595/management.fon.2022.0003 · Cited by 1
Ahmad, F., Merwin, M., Jaffri, A., & Krajicek, B. J. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.34238 · Cited by 1
Impactful COVID-19 discoveries from China are neglected in the media
Zhang, Y. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04779-2 · Cited by 2
Research impact in randomized controlled trials of diabetes: an altmetric approach
Sedghi, S., Abouhamzeh, K., Dokhani, F., Delavari, S., Soltani, A., Soleimanpour, S., Nemati‐Anaraki, L., & Aletaha, A. (2023) · Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40200-023-01287-1 · Cited by 1
Comparative Analysis of Institutional Dashboards Provided by Overseas Scholarly Infrastructures
Ikeya, R., Onami, J., Kanazawa, T., Nishioka, C., Takaku, M., & Yamaji, K. (2024) · Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi · doi:10.2964/jsik_2024_002
Biesenbender, S., & Hartstein, J. (2024) · Higher education research and science studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-43683-4 · Cited by 1
An examination of the “top 100” articles published in 2023: an altmetric analysis
Shimray, S. R., & Nongsiej, P. (2024) · Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication · doi:10.1108/gkmc-02-2024-0083 · Cited by 1
da Silva, M. R., Rocha, E. S. S., Alves, A. P. M., & Trindade, D. D. R. (2024) · Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.5195/biblios.2024.1142 · Cited by 1
Putera, P. B., Iriany, I. S., Gustina, A., Pasciana, R., Wismayanti, Y. F., & Qatrunnada, N. (2024) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-23-0047.1 · Cited by 2
Zagovora, O., & Weller, K. (2024) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05204-y · Cited by 1
Journal editors’ views on altmetrics in tourism and hospitality research
Pratt, S., & Zivrali, E. (2024) · Anatolia · doi:10.1080/13032917.2024.2446202 · Cited by 1
Evaluating journals' yearly impact with altmetric indicators
Simon, S. L., & Fred, Y. Y. (2015) · Journal of Data and Information Science · Cited by 1
Либкинд, А. Н., Markusova, V. A., & Bogorov, V. (2018) · Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics · doi:10.3103/s0005105518020061 · Cited by 1
What kind of impact is more important? … role of altmetrics indicators
Sygocki, W., & Korzeniewska, E. (2018) · Applications of Electromagnetics in Modern Techniques and Medicine (PTZE) · doi:10.1109/ptze.2018.8503248 · Cited by 1
Love, J., Santen, S. A., Way, D. P., Munzer, B., Merritt, C., Ander, D. S., & Cyrus, J. W. W. (2019) · Western Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44484 · Cited by 1
The Most Influential Publications on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Bibliometric Analysis
Bang, C. S., Lee, J. J., & Baik, G. H. (2020) · The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research · doi:10.7704/kjhugr.2020.0043 · Cited by 1
Yang, S., & Qi, F. (2020) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1
Gerring, J., Mahoney, J., & Elman, C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.018 · Cited by 1
Gerring, J., & Cojocaru, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.005 · Cited by 1
Gerring, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.014 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Costas, Rodrigo
- Zahedi, Zohreh
- Wouters, Paul
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07-28
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2003-2019
- ISSN
- 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-1643
- OpenAlex
- W2164277894
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 16
- FWCI
- 52.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- EU FP7 ACUMEN (266632)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- altmetrics, citation analysis, Altmetric.com, social media engagement, research impact, highly cited papers, research evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
