Cited by 711scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsAcademic Publishing and Open Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective

Open access
Costas, Rodrigo, Zahedi, Zohreh, Wouters, Paul·2015·Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Abstract

An extensive analysis of the presence of different altmetric indicators provided by Altmetric.com across scientific fields is presented, particularly focusing on their relationship with citations. Our results confirm that the presence and density of social media altmetric counts are still very low and not very frequent among scientific publications, with 15%–24% of the publications presenting some altmetric activity and concentrated on the most recent publications, although their presence is increasing over time. Publications from the social sciences, humanities, and the medical and life sciences show the highest presence of altmetrics, indicating their potential value and interest for these fields. The analysis of the relationships between altmetrics and citations confirms previous claims of positive correlations but is relatively weak, thus supporting the idea that altmetrics do not reflect the same kind of impact as citations. Also, altmetric counts do not always present a better filtering of highly‐cited publications than journal citation scores. Altmetric scores (particularly mentions in blogs) are able to identify highly‐cited publications with higher levels of precision than journal citation scores ( JCS ), but they have a lower level of recall. The value of altmetrics as a complementary tool of citation analysis is highlighted, although more research is suggested to disentangle the potential meaning and value of altmetric indicators for research evaluation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.23309

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bar‐Ilan J.(2012).JASIST@ Mendeley. Presented at ACM Web Science Conference Workshop on Altmetrics Evanston IL 21 June 2012. Retrieved from:http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/bar‐ilan/
  2. Piwowar H., 2013, Value all research products, Nature, 493, 2013
  3. Schmidt M.(2012).Development and evaluation of a match key for linking references to cited articles. InProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators Montréal; Science‐Metrix and OST Volume 2(pp.707–718).
  4. Zahedi Z., 2013, Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Vienna, Austria, 876

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 711

Metadata

Authors
Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Costas, Rodrigo
  • Zahedi, Zohreh
  • Wouters, Paul
Venue
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-28
Volume
66
Issue
10
Pages
2003-2019
ISSN
  • 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
  • 2330-1643
OpenAlex
W2164277894
Cited by
711
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 16
FWCI
52.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
EU FP7 ACUMEN (266632)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
altmetrics, citation analysis, Altmetric.com, social media engagement, research impact, highly cited papers, research evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review