Cited by 117Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The ADOS Calibrated Severity Score: Relationship to Phenotypic Variables and Stability over Time

Open access
Shumway, Stacy, Farmer, Cristan, Thurm, Audrey, Joseph, Lisa, Black, David, Golden, Christine·2012·Autism Research

Abstract

Measurement of the severity of autism at a single time point, and over time, is a widespread challenge for researchers. Recently, G otham, P ickles, and L ord published a severity metric (calibrated severity scores; CSS) that takes into account age and language level and is based on raw total scores of the A utism D iagnostic O bservation S chedule (ADOS), a standardized measure commonly used in autism diagnosis. The present study examined psychometric characteristics of the CSS compared to raw scores in an independent sample of 368 children aged 2 to 12 years with autism, pervasive developmental disorder‐not otherwise specified (PDD‐NOS), non‐spectrum delay, or typical development. Reflecting the intended calibration, the CSS were more uniformly distributed within clinical diagnostic category and across ADOS modules than were raw scores. Cross‐sectional analyses examining raw and severity scores and their relationships to participant characteristics revealed that verbal developmental level was a significant predictor of raw score but accounted for significantly less variance in the CSS. Longitudinal analyses indicated overall stability of the CSS over 12 to 24 months in children with autism. Findings from this study support the use of the CSS as a more valid indicator of autism severity than the ADOS raw total score, and extend the literature by examining the stability over 12 to 24 months of the CSS in children with ASD. Autism Res 2012, 5: 267–276. © 2012 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.1238

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ADOS-2 standardized scores have little relation to age or IQ.

    “These scores have little relation to age or IQ (Kanne et al. 2011, Shumway et al. 2012), and some evidence suggests that they may be useful for identifying different trajectories of ASD severity (Gotham et al. 2012).”

    From Recent Advances in Autism Research as Reflected in DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (2015) · cites this paper as Shumway et al. 2012

    The Results (page not provided) show that cognitive and demographic variables explained less variance in calibrated severity scores (18%) than in ADOS raw scores (56%); no individual variable, including age or developmental-quotient measures, reached the paper’s significance threshold for predicting calibrated scores. This supports a relatively weak relationship, but the study examined ADOS calibrated severity scores, not scores explicitly identified as ADOS-2 scores. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bishop S Guthrie W Coffing M Lord C 2011 Covergent validity of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning and the Differential Ability Scales in children with autism spectrum disorders American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 116 331 343 21905802 PMC7398154
  2. Charman T Taylor E Drew A Cockerill H Brown J Baird G 2005 Outcome at 7 years of children diagnosed with autism at age 2: Predictive validity of assessments conducted at 2 and 3 years of age and pattern of symptom change over time Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 46 500 513 15845130
  3. de Bildt A Oosterling I van Lang N Sytema S Minderaa R van Engeland H 2011 Standardized ADOS scores: Measuring severity of autism spectrum disorders in a Dutch sample Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 41 311 319 20617374 PMC3040310
  4. Gotham K Risi S Pickles A Lord C 2007 The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: Revised algorithms for improved diagnostic validity Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 37 613 627 17180459
  5. Hurt B Arnold L Aman M Martin A Scahill L Kratochvil C 2010 Clinical instruments and scales in pediatric psychopharmacology Pediatric Psychopharmacology: Principles and Practice 2 New York, NY Oxford University Press
  6. Krug D Arick J Almond P 1980 Behavior checklist for identifying severely handicapped individuals with high levels of autistic behavior Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 21 221 229 7430288
  7. Lord C Risi S Lambrecht L Cook E Jr Leventhal B DiLavore P 2000 The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 30 205 223 11055457
  8. Sparrow S Cicchetti D Balla D 2005 Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Survey Interview Form/Caregiver Rating Form 2 Livonia, MN Pearson Assessments
  9. Stone W Lee E Ashford L Brissie J Hepburn S Coonrod E 1999 Can autism be diagnosed accurately in children under 3 years? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 40 219 226 10188704

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shumway, S., Farmer, C., Thurm, A., Joseph, L., Black, D., & Golden, C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Farmer, Cristan
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-24
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
267-276
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W2123735324
Cited by
117
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002868)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism severity, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, severity measurement, longitudinal stability, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, children with autism, psychometric properties
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Language Development Disorders, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personality Assessment, Phenotype, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review