Cited by 181Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Limited Fine Motor and Grasping Skills in 6-Month-Old Infants at High Risk for Autism

Open access
Libertus, Klaus, Sheperd, Kelly A, Ross, Samuel W, Landa, Rebecca J·2014·Child Development

Abstract

Atypical motor behaviors are common among children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, little is known about onset and functional implications of differences in early motor development among infants later diagnosed with ASD. Two prospective experiments were conducted to investigate motor skills among 6-month-olds at increased risk (high risk) for ASD (N1 = 129; N2 = 46). Infants were assessed using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) and during toy play. Across both experiments, high-risk infants exhibited less mature object manipulation in a highly structured (MSEL) context and reduced grasping activity in an unstructured (free-play) context than infants with no family history of ASD. Longitudinal assessments suggest that between 6 and 10 months, grasping activity increases in high-risk infants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12262

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Libertus, K., Sheperd, K. A., Ross, S. W., & Landa, R. J.
Affiliations
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Landa, Rebecca J
Venue
Child Development
Published
2014-11-01
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
2218-2231
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2094692098
Cited by
181
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01 MH 59630-06A3)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH59630)
  • Autism Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, high-risk infants, fine motor skills, grasping, object manipulation, motor development, early childhood motor development, family history of autism, free play, Mullen Scales of Early Learning
MeSH terms
Child Development, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Motor Activity, Motor Skills, Play and Playthings, Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review