Cited by 60Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology Research

Voice identity processing in autism spectrum disorder

Schelinski, Stefanie, Roswandowitz, Claudia, von Kriegstein, Katharina·2017·Autism Research

Abstract

People with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have difficulties in identifying another person by face and voice. This might contribute considerably to the development of social cognition and interaction difficulties. The characteristics of the voice recognition deficit in ASD are unknown. Here, we used a comprehensive behavioral test battery to systematically investigate voice processing in high‐functioning ASD (n = 16) and typically developed pair‐wise matched controls (n = 16). The ASD group had particular difficulties with discriminating, learning, and recognizing unfamiliar voices, while recognizing famous voices was relatively intact. Tests on acoustic processing abilities showed that the ASD group had a specific deficit in vocal pitch perception that was dissociable from otherwise intact acoustic processing (i.e., musical pitch, musical, and vocal timbre perception). Our results allow a characterization of the voice recognition deficit in ASD: The findings indicate that in high‐functioning ASD, the difficulty to recognize voices is particularly pronounced for learning novel voices and the recognition of unfamiliar peoples’ voices. This pattern might be indicative of difficulties with integrating the acoustic characteristics of the voice into a coherent percept—a function that has been previously associated with voice‐selective regions in the posterior superior temporal sulcus/gyrus of the human brain. Autism Res 2017, 10: 155–168. © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.1639

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schelinski, S., Roswandowitz, C., & von Kriegstein, K.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • International Max Planck Research School on Neuroscience of Communication Leipzig Germany
  • Humboldt University of Berlin Berlin Germany
Corresponding author
Schelinski, Stefanie
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-12
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
155-168
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W2493493436
Cited by
60
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Max Planck Society; Max Planck Research Group
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, voice recognition, acoustic processing, timbre perception, social cognition, high-functioning autism, posterior superior temporal sulcus
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Voice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review