Cited by 38Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

Addressing current barriers to autism diagnoses through a tiered diagnostic approach involving pediatric primary care providers

Wieckowski, Andrea Trubanova, Zuckerman, Katharine E., Broder‐Fingert, Sarabeth, Robins, Diana L.·2022·Autism Research

Abstract

Formal autism diagnosis from a specialist trained in autism assessment is customary prior to a child accessing early, intensive autism‐specific services. However, long wait lists for diagnostic evaluations and limited specialty workforce have created substantial delays. Additionally, lengthy multidisciplinary evaluations are costly to insurers, inconvenient to families, and disproportionally impact under‐resourced families. Diagnostic delays can impede access to intervention services. These barriers, combined with evidence regarding the importance of receiving early, autism‐specific treatment, demand new approaches enabling access to autism specific services before comprehensive evaluation. Pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) are often the only health care professionals with whom a family interacts during early childhood and can play a crucial role in helping children with autism symptoms access services. Many strategies for autism diagnosis in primary care are being developed and tested; however, they have yet to be broadly adopted by PCPs, primarily due to critical implementation barriers in primary care settings. There is also not enough evidence on the accuracy of PCPs' diagnostic impressions without extensive specialty support, resulting in PCP hesitancy in diagnosing ASD, as well as family and service provider hesitancy in accepting a PCP autism diagnosis. In this commentary, we explore the acute need for shortening waitlists for autism evaluations through a tiered diagnostic approach, in which PCPs can rule in or rule out autism in children, for whom diagnosis is clear, and refer more complex cases for specialist evaluations, and explore implementation challenges to this approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.2832

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wieckowski, A. T., Zuckerman, K. E., Broder‐Fingert, S., & Robins, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Wieckowski, Andrea Trubanova
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10-17
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
2216-2222
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W4306677949
Cited by
38
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism diagnosis, pediatric primary care, delayed diagnosis, autism spectrum disorder, specialist referral, implementation barriers, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Primary Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review