Cited by 101Estrogen and related hormone effectsPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Effect of age and single versus multiple dose pharmacokinetics of letrozole (Femara®) in breast cancer patients

Pfister, Christian U., Martoni, Antonio, Zamagni, Carlo, Lelli, Giorgio, De Braud, Filippo, Souppart, Claire, Duval, Martine, Hornberger, Ulrike·2001·Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition

Abstract

Letrozole (trademark Femara) is a new orally active, potent and selective aromatase inhibitor for the hormonal treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The pharmacokinetics of letrozole and the suppression of peripheral estrogens were studied in 28 breast cancer patients after a single dose and at steady state. The pharmacokinetics of two distinct age groups (> or =50, < or =65, N=15 and > or =70 years old, N=9) were compared. There were no significant differences in area under the curve (AUC) or terminal half-life between the two age groups neither after a single dose nor at steady state. However, when comparing steady state to single dose kinetics, half-life and AUC increased significantly by 42% (90% CI: 1.13, 1.78) and 28% (90% CI: 1.12, 1.47), respectively. This deviation from linearity was probably due to a partial saturation or auto-inhibition of the dominant metabolic clearance mechanism of letrozole. At steady state, approximately 70% of the administered dose was excreted in urine as unchanged letrozole (6.0+/-3.8%) or as the glucuronide of the major, pharmacologically inactive metabolite CGP44645 (64.2+/-22.7%). A single dose of letrozole caused suppression of serum estrogen levels close to the quantification limit of the assay. No difference between single dose suppression and suppression at steady state could be detected.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bdd.273

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfister, C. U., Martoni, A., Zamagni, C., Lelli, G., De Braud, F., Souppart, C., Duval, M., & Hornberger, U.
Affiliations
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
  • Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
  • Novartis (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
Pfister, Christian U.
Venue
Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
191-197
ISSN
  • 0142-2782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-081X
OpenAlex
W1971412206
Cited by
101
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
letrozole, aromatase inhibitors, breast cancer, pharmacokinetics, aging, age differences, steady-state kinetics, estrogen suppression, urinary excretion, glucuronide metabolites, drug metabolism
MeSH terms
Letrozole, Age Factors, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Enzyme Inhibitors, Estrogens, Humans, Middle Aged, Nitriles, Triazoles, Area Under Curve, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review