Cited by 2Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

Associations Between Maternal Periconceptional Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Craniosynostosis Among Offspring, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011

Open access
Fisher, Sarah C., Romitti, Paul A., Tracy, Melissa, Howley, Meredith M., Jabs, Ethylin Wang, Browne, Marilyn L., the National Birth Defects Prevention Study·2024·Birth Defects Research

Abstract

Background: Previous studies of maternal alcohol consumption and craniosynostosis have reported null or inverse associations. We updated a previous analysis of National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) data to further examine associations between maternal alcohol consumption and craniosynostosis. Methods: NBDPS was a multi‐site, population‐based case–control study. Mothers of craniosynostosis cases and randomly selected liveborn controls delivered during 1997–2011 completed a telephone interview about pregnancy exposures. We examined associations for self‐reported periconceptional maternal alcohol consumption (during the month before conception through the third gestational month) and odds of craniosynostosis in offspring. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between any alcohol consumption and binge consumption and craniosynostosis, overall and by affected suture. Finally, we performed a probabilistic bias analysis using a range of assumptions about the sensitivity and specificity of self‐reported consumption by case/control status. Results: We analyzed interview data from 1435 mothers of craniosynostosis cases and 11,216 mothers of controls. Periconceptional alcohol consumption prevalence was similar among case (36.9%) and control (38.2%) mothers. We observed point estimates near or below 1.0 for alcohol consumption (any and binge) and all suture subtypes of craniosynostosis, with all CIs including the null. Our bias‐adjusted estimates for periconceptional alcohol consumption were higher than our conventional estimates but supported the null findings. Conclusions: We observed primarily null associations between maternal periconceptional alcohol consumption and craniosynostosis. However, our findings do not diminish the prevailing clinical guidance in the United States that pregnant people should abstain from alcohol consumption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bdr2.2420

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal alcohol consumption is associated with odds ratios close to unity (OR ~0.8-1.0) for sCS.

    “Maternal alcohol consumption has been associated with odds ratios close to unity (OR ~ 0.8–1.0) for sCS [56, 65], but this does not imply a protective effect and does not modify existing recommendations to abstain from alcohol during pregnancy.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]Carmichael S, Ma C, Rasmussen S, Craniosynostosis and risk factors related to thyroid dysfunction. Am J Med Genet A 2015. PMC4768483 25655789

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, S. C., Romitti, P. A., Tracy, M., Howley, M. M., Jabs, E. W., Browne, M. L., & Study, T. N. B. D. P.
Affiliations
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Sarah C.
Venue
Birth Defects Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-12
Volume
116
Issue
12
Pages
e2420-e2420
ISSN
2472-1727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405332840
Cited by
2
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Birth Defects Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
craniosynostosis, maternal alcohol consumption, periconceptional period, prenatal alcohol exposure, binge drinking, congenital malformations, prenatal exposure, self-reported alcohol consumption, bias correction, National Birth Defects Prevention Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Craniosynostoses, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors, United States, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Maternal Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review