CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mobile Phone Use and Time Trend of Brain Cancer Incidence Rate in Korea

Choi, Kyung‐Hwa, Ha, Johyun, Bae, Sanghyuk, Lee, Ae‐Kyoung, Choi, Hyung‐Do, Ahn, Young Hwan, Ha, Mina, Joo, Hyunjoo, Kwon, Ho‐Jang, Jung, Kyu‐Won·2021·Bioelectromagnetics
DOI 10.1002/bem.22373
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study evaluated the time trends in mobile phone subscriber number by mobile network generation (G) and brain cancer incidence by type in Korea. We obtained data from the Information Technology Statistics of Korea (1984–2017) and Korea Central Cancer Registry (1999–2017). The average annual percent change was estimated using Joinpoint regression analysis. We evaluated 29,721 brain cancer cases with an age‐standardized incidence rate (ASR) of 2.89/100,000 persons. The glioma and glioblastoma annual ASR significantly increased in 2.6% and 3.9% of males and 3.0% and 3.8% of females, respectively. The ASR for frontal lobe involvement was the highest. The ASR of gliomas of unspecified grade annually increased by 7.8%; those for unspecified topology and histology decreased. The incidence of glioma, glioblastoma, frontal, temporal, and high‐grade glioma increased among those aged ≥60 years. No association was observed between the mobile phone subscriber number and brain cancer incidence in Korea. Furthermore, long‐term research is warranted because of the latency period of brain cancer. © 2021 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bem.22373

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00018 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/jnci/djr244 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.11.5857 · DOI
  4. 10.1088/0031-9155/53/11/001 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s10654-007-9152-z · DOI
  6. 10.1136/oemed-2011-100065 · DOI
  7. 10.22629/kabh.2015.30.2.004 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.canep.2016.04.010 · DOI
  9. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000156351.72313.D3 · DOI
  10. Cook A, 2003, Cellular telephone use and time trends for brain, head and neck tumours, N Z Med J, 116, U457
  11. 10.1016/j.envint.2016.10.019 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.011 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/bem.20648 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182448295 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/jnci/djp415 · DOI
  16. Ding LX, 2011, Increasing incidence of brain and nervous tumours in urban Shanghai, China, 1983‐2007, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 3319
  17. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30468-X · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.pathophys.2014.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.003 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/ije/dyq246 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.11.001 · DOI
  22. 10.1097/00008469-200208000-00010 · DOI
  23. Hardell L, 1999, Use of cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumours: A case‐control study, Int J Oncol, 15, 113
  24. 10.4143/crt.2020.206 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.respe.2007.06.002 · DOI
  26. Howlader N, 2016, SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975‐2013
  27. 10.1056/NEJM200101113440201 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/ije/dyq079 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.canep.2011.05.012 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/jnci/93.3.203 · DOI
  31. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024489 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.canep.2018.07.003 · DOI
  33. 10.4062/biomolther.2018.152 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/1753-6405.12338 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/aje/kwr071 · DOI
  36. 10.1136/bmj.e1147 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1097/01.ede.0000142519.00772.bf · DOI
  38. 10.1093/aje/kwi091 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/ijc.11578 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s13277-013-1081-8 · DOI
  41. 10.1212/WNL.58.8.1304 · DOI
  42. 10.1001/jama.284.23.3001 · DOI
  43. 10.21873/anticanres.13176 · DOI
  44. Philips A, 2018, Brain tumours: Rise in glioblastoma multiforme incidence in England 1995‐2015 suggests an adverse environmental or lifestyle factor, J Environ Public Health, 2018, 7910754
  45. 10.1097/01.cej.0000203618.61936.cd · DOI
  46. 10.1667/RR3329 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/aje/kwm325 · DOI
  48. 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00124 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/bem.20616 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/bem.21982 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602764 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/aje/kwj068 · DOI
  53. 10.1667/RR3581.1 · DOI
  54. 10.1136/oem.2006.028308 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Choi, K., Ha, J., Bae, S., Lee, A., Choi, H., Ahn, Y. H., Ha, M., Joo, H., Kwon, H., & Jung, K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Preventive Medicine Dankook University College of Medicine Cheonan Republic of Korea
  • Division of Cancer Registration and Surveillance, National Cancer Control Institute National Cancer Center Goyang Republic of Korea
  • Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Republic of Korea
  • Radio Technology Research Department ETRI Daejeon Republic of Korea
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine Ajou University Hospital Suwon Republic of Korea
ORCID
Venue
Bioelectromagnetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-09-20
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
629-648
ISSN
  • 0197-8462
  • 1521-186X
DOI
10.1002/bem.22373
Cited by
10
References
1
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review