The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory
Open accessAbstract
The somatic mutation theory (SMT) of cancer has been and remains the prevalent theory attempting to explain how neoplasms arise and progress. This theory proposes that cancer is a clonal, cell‐based disease, and implicitly assumes that quiescence is the default state of cells in multicellular organisms. The SMT has not been rigorously tested, and several lines of evidence raise questions that are not addressed by this theory. Herein, we propose experimental strategies that may validate the SMT. We also call attention to an alternative theory of carcinogenesis, the tissue organization field theory (TOFT), which posits that cancer is a tissue‐based disease and that proliferation is the default state of all cells. Based on epistemological and experimental evidence, we argue that the TOFT compellingly explains carcinogenesis, while placing it within an evolutionarily relevant context. magnified image magnified image Ana Soto and Carlos Sonnenschein are at Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9 · Cited by 29,219
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001 · Cited by 21,170
Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid
WATSON, J. D., & CRICK, F. H. C. (1953) · Nature · doi:10.1038/171737a0 · Cited by 13,584
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Lakatos, I. (1970) · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009 · Cited by 4,649
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2007) · W.W. Norton eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203833445 · Cited by 4,589
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Lakatos, I. (1976) · Can Theories be Refuted? · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_14 · Cited by 3,915
Stratton, M. R., Campbell, P. J., & Futreal, P. A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07943 · Cited by 3,449
Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes
Greenman, C., Stephens, P., Smith, R., Dalgliesh, G. L., Hunter, C., Bignell, G., Davies, H., Teague, J., Butler, A., Stevens, C., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05610 · Cited by 3,080
The Genomic Landscapes of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers
Wood, L. D., Parsons, D. W., Jones, S., Lin, J., Sjöblom, T., Leary, R. J., Shen, D., Boca, S. M., Barber, T., Ptak, J., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1145720 · Cited by 2,833
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Triolo VA, 1965, Nineteenth century foundations of cancer research advances in tumor pathology, nomenclature, and theories of oncogenesis, Cancer Res, 25, 76
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(62)91475-7 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(62)91475-7
- 10.1038/453604a · doi:10.1038/453604a
- Sonnenschein C, 1999, The Society of Cells: Cancer and Control of Cell Proliferation
- Alberts B, 1994, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 1255
- Virchow R, 1860, Cellular Pathology, 441
- Orr JW, 1972, Tissue Interactions in Carcinogenesis, 291
- 10.1002/1097-0142(19880815)62:4<818::AID-CNCR2820620430>3.0.CO;2-K · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19880815)62:4<818::aid-cncr2820620430>3.0.co;2-k
- 10.1016/S0960-9776(09)70266-8 · doi:10.1016/s0960-9776(09)70266-8
- 10.1053/suro.2002.35051 · doi:10.1053/suro.2002.35051
Cited by
Cancer stem cells: advances in knowledge and implications for cancer therapy
Chu, X., Tian, W., Ning, J., Xiao, G., Zhou, Y., Wang, Z., Zhai, Z., Tanzhu, G., Yang, J., & Zhou, R. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01851-y · Cited by 553
TGF-β signalling and its role in cancer progression and metastasis
Drabsch, Y., & ten Dijke, P. (2012) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-012-9375-7 · Cited by 428
Tumor initiation and early tumorigenesis: molecular mechanisms and interventional targets
Zhang, S., Xiao, X., Yi, Y., Wang, X., Zhu, L., Shen, Y., Lin, D., & Wu, C. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01848-7 · Cited by 399
Cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumor microenvironment–Accomplices in tumor malignancy
Liao, Z., Tan, Z. W., Zhu, P., & Tan, N. S. (2019) · Cellular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2017.12.003 · Cited by 335
Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials and Their Influence Upon Cell Behavior
Cramer, M. C., & Badylak, S. F. (2020) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02408-9 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Soto, A. M., & Sonnenschein, C.
- Venue
- BioEssays
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-18
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 332-340
- ISSN
- 0265-9247 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-1878
- OpenAlex
- W2147656978
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bies.201100025
- The paper
- Soto, A. M., & Sonnenschein, C. (2011). The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory. BioEssays. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201100025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
