The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution
Open accessAbstract
A common belief is that evolution generally proceeds towards greater complexity at both the organismal and the genomic level, numerous examples of reductive evolution of parasites and symbionts notwithstanding. However, recent evolutionary reconstructions challenge this notion. Two notable examples are the reconstruction of the complex archaeal ancestor and the intron‐rich ancestor of eukaryotes. In both cases, evolution in most of the lineages was apparently dominated by extensive loss of genes and introns, respectively. These and many other cases of reductive evolution are consistent with a general model composed of two distinct evolutionary phases: the short, explosive, innovation phase that leads to an abrupt increase in genome complexity, followed by a much longer reductive phase, which encompasses either a neutral ratchet of genetic material loss or adaptive genome streamlining. Quantitatively, the evolution of genomes appears to be dominated by reduction and simplification, punctuated by episodes of complexification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE GENETIC BASIS OF EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE
Felsenstein, J. (1975) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00851.x · Cited by 3,912
An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications
Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (2019) · Texts in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11298-1 · Cited by 3,681
Genomics and Evolution of Heritable Bacterial Symbionts
Moran, N. A., McCutcheon, J. P., & Nakabachi, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119 · Cited by 1,737
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698
Endosymbiotic gene transfer: organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes
Timmis, J. N., Ayliffe, M. A., Huang, C. Y., & Martin, W. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1271 · Cited by 1,568
Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria
McCutcheon, J. P., & Moran, N. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2670 · Cited by 1,464
An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications
Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (2008) · Texts in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49820-1 · Cited by 1,424
Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria.
Makarova, K., Slesarev, A., Wolf, Y., Sorokin, A., Mirkin, B., Koonin, E., Pavlov, A., Pavlova, N., Karamychev, V., Polouchine, N., et al. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607117103 · Cited by 1,391
Self-citationThe energetics of genome complexity.
Lane, N., & Martin, W. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09486 · Cited by 1,289
Genome Streamlining in a Cosmopolitan Oceanic Bacterium
Giovannoni, S. J., Tripp, H. J., Givan, S., Podar, M., Vergin, K. L., Baptista, D., Bibbs, L., Eads, J., Richardson, T. H., Noordewier, M., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114057 · Cited by 1,211
Cited by
Albalat, R., & Cañestro, C. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.39 · Cited by 775
Tempo and Mode of Genome Evolution in the Budding Yeast Subphylum
Shen, X.-X., Opulente, D. A., Kominek, J., Zhou, X., Steenwyk, J. L., Buh, K. V., Haase, M. A. B., Wisecaver, J. H., Wang, M., Doering, D. T., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.023 · Cited by 619
Endosymbiotic theory for organelle origins
Zimorski, V., Ku, C., Martin, W. F., & Gould, S. B. (2014) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.09.008 · Cited by 453
Genomes in turmoil: quantification of genome dynamics in prokaryote supergenomes
Puigbò, P., Lobkovsky, A. E., Kristensen, D. M., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2014) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-014-0066-4 · Cited by 232
Self-citationSantoro, A. E., Dupont, C. L., Richter, R. A., Craig, M. T., Carini, P., McIlvin, M. R., Yang, Y., Orsi, W. D., Moran, D. M., & Saito, M. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1416223112 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V.
- Venue
- BioEssays
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-25
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 829-837
- ISSN
- 0265-9247 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-1878
- OpenAlex
- W1573821798
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bies.201300037
- The paper
- Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2013). Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution. BioEssays. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201300037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
