The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial peptides: New candidates in the fight against bacterial infections
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) of innate origin are agents of the most ancient form of defense systems. They can be found in a wide variety of species ranging from bacteria through insects to humans. Through the course of evolution, host organisms developed arsenals of AMPs that protect them against a large variety of invading pathogens including both Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria. At a time of increasing bacterial resistance, AMPs have been the focus of investigation in a number of laboratories worldwide. Although recent studies show that some of the peptides are likely to have intracellular targets, the vast majority of AMPs appear to act by permeabilization of the bacterial cell membrane. Their activity and selectivity are governed by the physicochemical parameters of the peptide chains as well as the properties of the membrane system itself. In this review, we will summarize some of the recent developments that provide us with a better understanding of the mode of action of this unique family of antibacterial agents. Particular attention will be given to the determinants of AMP–lipid bilayer interactions as well as to the different pore formation mechanisms. The emphasis will be on linear AMPs but representatives of cysteine‐bridged AMPs will also be discussed. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 80: 717–735, 2005 This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity
Ganz, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1180 · Cited by 3,066
Anti-microbial peptides: from invertebrates to vertebrates
Bulet, P., Stöcklin, R., & Menin, L. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0124.x · Cited by 1,107
Cited by
Advance in peptide-based drug development: delivery platforms, therapeutics and vaccines
Xiao, W., Jiang, W., Chen, Z., Huang, Y., Mao, J., Zheng, W., Hu, Y., & Shi, J. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-02107-5 · Cited by 449
Antimicrobial peptides and plant disease control
Montesinos, E. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00683.x · Cited by 376
Mutuku, C., Gazdag, Z., & Melegh, S. (2022) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-022-03334-0 · Cited by 280
Antimicrobial Activity of Cathelicidin-Derived Peptide from the Iberian Mole Talpa occidentalis
Otazo-Pérez, A., Asensio-Calavia, P., González-Acosta, S., Baca-González, V., López, M. R., Morales-delaNuez, A., & Pérez de la Lastra, J. M. (2022) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines10071105 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Toke, O.
- Venue
- Peptide Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 717-735
- ISSN
- 0006-3525 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028869026
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial peptides: New candidates in the fight against bacterial infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bip.20286
- The paper
- Toke, O. (2005). Antimicrobial peptides: New candidates in the fight against bacterial infections. Peptide Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.20286
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.