The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Oscillating perfusion of cell suspensions through three‐dimensional scaffolds enhances cell seeding efficiency and uniformity
Abstract
We developed a bioreactor for automated cell seeding of three‐dimensional scaffolds by continuous perfusion of a cell suspension through the scaffold pores in oscillating directions. Using quantitative biochemical and image analysis techniques, we then evaluated the efficiency and uniformity of perfusion seeding of Polyactive foams as compared to conventional static and spinner flask methods. Finally, we assessed the efficacy of the perfusion seeding technique for different scaffolds and cell types. Perfusion seeding of chondrocytes into Polyactive foams resulted in “viable cell seeding efficiencies,” defined as the percentages of initially loaded cells that were seeded and remained viable, that were significantly higher (75 ± 6%) than those by static (57% ± 5%) and spinner flask seeding (55% ± 8%). In addition, as compared to static and spinner flask methods, cells seeded by perfusion were respectively 2.6‐fold and 3.8‐fold more uniformly distributed and formed more homogeneously sized cell clusters. Chondrocytes seeded by perfusion into Hyaff®‐11 nonwoven meshes were 26% and 63%, respectively, more uniformly distributed than following static and spinner flask seeding. Bone marrow stromal cells seeded by perfusion into ChronOS™ porous ceramics were homogeneously distributed throughout the scaffold volume, while following the static method, cells were found only near the top surface of the ceramic. In summary, we demonstrated that our cell seeding perfusion bioreactor generated constructs with remarkably uniform cell distributions at high efficiencies, and was effective for a variety of scaffolds and different mesenchymal cell types. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 84: 205–214, 2003.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture: A Breakthrough in Vivo
Antoni, D., Burckel, H., Josset, E., & Noel, G. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16035517 · Cited by 990
Sobral, J. M., Caridade, S. G., Sousa, R. A., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. (2011) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003 · Cited by 561
Lowery, J. L., Datta, N., & Rutledge, G. C. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.072 · Cited by 448
Perfusion Improves Tissue Architecture of Engineered Cardiac Muscle
Carrier, R. L., Rupnick, M., Langer, R., Schoen, F. J., Freed, L. E., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2002) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632702753724950 · Cited by 323
Cardiac tissue engineering using perfusion bioreactor systems
Radisic, M., Marsano, A., Maidhof, R., Wang, Y., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.40 · Cited by 273
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wendt, D., Marsano, A., Jakob, M., Heberer, M., & Martin, I.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-29
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-214
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2018448036
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oscillating perfusion of cell suspensions through three‐dimensional scaffolds enhances cell seeding efficiency and uniformity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.10759
- The paper
- Wendt, D., Marsano, A., Jakob, M., Heberer, M., & Martin, I. (2003). Oscillating perfusion of cell suspensions through three‐dimensional scaffolds enhances cell seeding efficiency and uniformity. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.