The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency
Open accessAbstract
Scaffolds produced by rapid prototyping (RP) techniques have proved their value for tissue engineering applications, due to their ability to produce predetermined forms and structures featuring fully interconnected pore architectures. Nevertheless, low cell seeding efficiency and non-uniform distribution of cells remain major limitations when using such types of scaffold. This can be mainly attributed to the inadequate pore architecture of scaffolds produced by RP and the limited efficiency of cell seeding techniques normally adopted. In this study we aimed at producing scaffolds with pore size gradients to enhance cell seeding efficiency and control the spatial organization of cells within the scaffold. Scaffolds based on blends of starch with poly(ε-caprolactone) featuring both homogeneously spaced pores (based on pore sizes of 0.75 and 0.1 mm) and pore size gradients (based on pore sizes of 0.1-0.75-0.1 and 0.75-0.1-0.75 mm) were designed and produced by three-dimensional plotting. The mechanical performance of the scaffolds was characterized using dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and conventional compression testing under wet conditions and subsequently characterized using scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Osteoblast-like cells were seeded onto such scaffolds to investigate cell seeding efficiency and the ability to control the zonal distribution of cells upon seeding. Scaffolds featuring continuous pore size gradients were originally produced. These scaffolds were shown to have intermediate mechanical and morphological properties compared with homogenous pore size scaffolds. The pore size gradient scaffolds improved seeding efficiency from ∼35% in homogeneous scaffolds to ∼70% under static culture conditions. Fluorescence images of cross-sections of the scaffolds revealed that scaffolds with pore size gradients induce a more homogeneous distribution of cells within the scaffold.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Langer, R., & Vacanti, J. P. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8493529 · Cited by 9,893
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
Karageorgiou, V., & Kaplan, D. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · Cited by 6,622
Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage
Hutmacher, D. W. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6 · Cited by 4,994
Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications
Zein, I., Hutmacher, D. W., Tan, K. C., & Teoh, S. H. (2002) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00232-0 · Cited by 1,874
The Biomedical Engineering Handbook
Bronzino, J. D., & Peterson, D. R. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b18423 · Cited by 1,599
Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior
Flemming, R. G., Murphy, C. J., Abrams, G. A., Goodman, S. L., & Nealey, P. F. (1999) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00209-9 · Cited by 1,450
Hutmacher, D. W., Schantz, T., Zein, I., Ng, K. W., Teoh, S. H., & Tan, K. C. (2001) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::aid-jbm1007>3.0.co;2-7 · Cited by 1,409
Hutmacher, D. W., Sittinger, M., & Risbud, M. V. (2004) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.05.005 · Cited by 1,121
Leong, K. F., Cheah, C. M., & Chua, C. K. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00030-9 · Cited by 1,076
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Matrices: State of the Art
Lee, J., Cuddihy, M. J., & Kotov, N. A. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/teb.2007.0150 · Cited by 1,047
Cited by
Recent Advances in Extrusion‐Based 3D Printing for Biomedical Applications
Placone, J. K., & Engler, A. J. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201701161 · Cited by 486
Strategic Design and Fabrication of Engineered Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair
Izadifar, Z., Chen, X., & Kulyk, W. (2012) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb3040799 · Cited by 203
Vyas, C., Zhang, J., Øvrebø, Ø., Huang, B., Roberts, I., Setty, M., Allardyce, B., Haugen, H., Rajkhowa, R., & Bartolo, P. (2021) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.111433 · Cited by 111
Tian, L., Zhang, Z., Tian, B., Zhang, X., & Wang, N. (2020) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c9ra10275b · Cited by 77
A 3D-Printed PLCL Scaffold Coated with Collagen Type I and Its Biocompatibility
He, Y., Liu, W., Guan, L., Chen, J., Duan, L., Jia, Z., Huang, J., Li, W., Liu, J., Xiong, J., et al. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/5147156 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Sobral, J. M., Caridade, S. G., Sousa, R. A., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1009-1018
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141577002
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003
- The paper
- Sobral, J. M., Caridade, S. G., Sousa, R. A., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. (2011). Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.