Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 561

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency

Open access
Sobral, Jorge M., Caridade, Sofia G., Sousa, Rui A., Mano, João F., Reis, Rui L.·2011·Acta Biomaterialia

Abstract

Scaffolds produced by rapid prototyping (RP) techniques have proved their value for tissue engineering applications, due to their ability to produce predetermined forms and structures featuring fully interconnected pore architectures. Nevertheless, low cell seeding efficiency and non-uniform distribution of cells remain major limitations when using such types of scaffold. This can be mainly attributed to the inadequate pore architecture of scaffolds produced by RP and the limited efficiency of cell seeding techniques normally adopted. In this study we aimed at producing scaffolds with pore size gradients to enhance cell seeding efficiency and control the spatial organization of cells within the scaffold. Scaffolds based on blends of starch with poly(ε-caprolactone) featuring both homogeneously spaced pores (based on pore sizes of 0.75 and 0.1 mm) and pore size gradients (based on pore sizes of 0.1-0.75-0.1 and 0.75-0.1-0.75 mm) were designed and produced by three-dimensional plotting. The mechanical performance of the scaffolds was characterized using dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and conventional compression testing under wet conditions and subsequently characterized using scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Osteoblast-like cells were seeded onto such scaffolds to investigate cell seeding efficiency and the ability to control the zonal distribution of cells upon seeding. Scaffolds featuring continuous pore size gradients were originally produced. These scaffolds were shown to have intermediate mechanical and morphological properties compared with homogenous pore size scaffolds. The pore size gradient scaffolds improved seeding efficiency from ∼35% in homogeneous scaffolds to ∼70% under static culture conditions. Fluorescence images of cross-sections of the scaffolds revealed that scaffolds with pore size gradients induce a more homogeneous distribution of cells within the scaffold.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 561

Metadata

Authors
Sobral, J. M., Caridade, S. G., Sousa, R. A., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L.
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
1009-1018
ISSN
1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141577002
Cited by
561
References
63
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003
The paper
Sobral, J. M., Caridade, S. G., Sousa, R. A., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. (2011). Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.