The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Orbital shaker technology for the cultivation of mammalian cells in suspension
Open accessAbstract
For large‐scale applications in biotechnology, cultivation of mammalian cells in suspension is an essential prerequisite. Typically, suspension cultures are grown in glass spinner flasks filled to less than 50% of the nominal volume. We propose a superior system for suspension cultures of mammalian cells based on orbital shaker technology. We found that “square‐shaped” bottles (square bottles) provide an inexpensive but efficient means to grow HEK‐293 EBNA and CHO‐DG44 cells to high density. Cultures in agitated 1‐L square bottles exceeded the performance of cultures in spinner flasks, reaching densities up to 7 × 10 6 cells/mL for HEK‐293 EBNA cells and 5 × 10 6 cells/mL for CHO‐DG44 cells in comparison to (2.5–4) × 10 6 cells/mL for cultures of the same cells grown in spinner flasks. For 1‐L square bottles, optimal cell growth and viability were observed with a filling volume of 30–40% of the nominal volume and an agitation speed of 130 rpm at a rotational diameter of 2.5 cm. Transient reporter gene expression following gene delivery by calcium phosphate–DNA co‐precipitation was the same or slightly better for HEK‐293 EBNA cells grown in square bottles as compared to spinner flasks. Reductions in cost, simplified handling, and better performance in cell growth and viability make the agitated square bottle a new and very promising tool for the cultivation of mammalian cells in suspension. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to advantages and problems of shaken cultures
Büchs, J. (2001) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/s1369-703x(00)00106-6 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Growth Factors Engineered for Super-Affinity to the Extracellular Matrix Enhance Tissue Healing
Martino, M. M., Briquez, P. S., Güç, E., Tortelli, F., Kilarski, W. W., Metzger, S., Rice, J. J., Kuhn, G. A., Müller, R., Swartz, M. A., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247663 · Cited by 498
Coordinated Effects of Sequence Variation on DNA Binding, Chromatin Structure, and Transcription
Kilpinen, H., Waszak, S. M., Gschwind, A. R., Raghav, S. K., Witwicki, R. M., Orioli, A., Migliavacca, E., Wiederkehr, M., Gutierrez-Arcelus, M., Panousis, N. I., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242463 · Cited by 337
Self-citationDisposable bioreactors: the current state-of-the-art and recommended applications in biotechnology
Eibl, R., Kaiser, S., Lombriser, R., & Eibl, D. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2422-9 · Cited by 260
Recent advances in mammalian protein production
Bandaranayake, A. D., & Almo, S. C. (2014) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.11.035 · Cited by 222
Reflections on more than 10 years of TGE approaches
Geisse, S. (2009) · Protein Expression and Purification · doi:10.1016/j.pep.2008.10.017 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Muller, N., Girard, P., Hacker, D. L., Jordan, M., & Wurm, F. M.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-23
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 400-406
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2116213570
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.