Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioconversion of hybrid poplar to ethanol and co‐products using an organosolv fractionation process: Optimization of process yields

Pan, Xuejun, Gilkes, Neil, Kadla, John, Pye, Kendall, Saka, Shiro, Gregg, David, Ehara, Katsunobu, Xie, Dan, Lam, Dexter, Saddler, Jack·2006·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

An organosolv process involving extraction with hot aqueous ethanol has been evaluated for bioconversion of hybrid poplar to ethanol. The process resulted in fractionation of poplar chips into a cellulose‐rich solids fraction, an ethanol organosolv lignin (EOL) fraction, and a water‐soluble fraction containing hemicellulosic sugars, sugar breakdown products, degraded lignin, and other components. The influence of four independent process variables (temperature, time, catalyst dose, and ethanol concentration) on product yields was analyzed over a broad range using a small composite design and response surface methodology. Center point conditions for the composite design (180°C, 60 min, 1.25% H 2 SO 4, and 60% ethanol), yielded a solids fraction containing ∼88% of the cellulose present in the untreated poplar. Approximately 82% of the total cellulose in the untreated poplar was recovered as monomeric glucose after hydrolysis of the solids fraction for 24 h using a low enzyme loading (20 filter paper units of cellulase/g cellulose); ∼85% was recovered after 48 h hydrolysis. Total recovery of xylose (soluble and insoluble) was equivalent to ∼72% of the xylose present in untreated wood. Approximately 74% of the lignin in untreated wood was recovered as EOL. Other cooking conditions resulted in either similar or inferior product yields although the distribution of components between the various fractions differed markedly. Data analysis generated regression models that describe process responses for any combination of the four variables. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.20905

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 455

Metadata

Authors
Pan, X., Gilkes, N., Kadla, J., Pye, K., Saka, S., Gregg, D., Ehara, K., Xie, D., Lam, D., & Saddler, J.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-28
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
851-861
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2118994676
Cited by
455
References
30
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioconversion of hybrid poplar to ethanol and co‐products using an organosolv fractionation process: Optimization of process yields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.20905
The paper
Pan, X., Gilkes, N., Kadla, J., Pye, K., Saka, S., Gregg, D., Ehara, K., Xie, D., Lam, D., & Saddler, J. (2006). Bioconversion of hybrid poplar to ethanol and co‐products using an organosolv fractionation process: Optimization of process yields. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.