The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microscale to manufacturing scale‐up of cell‐free cytokine production—a new approach for shortening protein production development timelines
Open accessAbstract
Engineering robust protein production and purification of correctly folded biotherapeutic proteins in cell‐based systems is often challenging due to the requirements for maintaining complex cellular networks for cell viability and the need to develop associated downstream processes that reproducibly yield biopharmaceutical products with high product quality. Here, we present an alternative Escherichia coli‐based open cell‐free synthesis (OCFS) system that is optimized for predictable high‐yield protein synthesis and folding at any scale with straightforward downstream purification processes. We describe how the linear scalability of OCFS allows rapid process optimization of parameters affecting extract activation, gene sequence optimization, and redox folding conditions for disulfide bond formation at microliter scales. Efficient and predictable high‐level protein production can then be achieved using batch processes in standard bioreactors. We show how a fully bioactive protein produced by OCFS from optimized frozen extract can be purified directly using a streamlined purification process that yields a biologically active cytokine, human granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor, produced at titers of 700 mg/L in 10 h. These results represent a milestone for in vitro protein synthesis, with potential for the cGMP production of disulfide‐bonded biotherapeutic proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108:1570–1578. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A General Method for Site-specific Incorporation of Unnatural Amino Acids into Proteins
Noren, C. J., Anthony-Cahill, S. J., Griffith, M. C., & Schultz, P. G. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2649980 · Cited by 1,019 · cited 3×
“…coli have a long history as experimental tools for exploring the molecular biology of transcription and translation (Jewett et al., 2002; Noren et al., 1989; Spirin et al., 1988; Zubay, 1973) and have been utilized as a basis for developing in vitro protein production systems at small…”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Cell-free protein synthesis: Applications come of age
Carlson, E. D., Gan, R., Hodgman, C. E., & Jewett, M. C. (2012) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.016 · Cited by 706
Cell-free gene expression: an expanded repertoire of applications
Silverman, A. D., Karim, A. S., & Jewett, M. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0186-3 · Cited by 593
Cell-free synthetic biology: Thinking outside the cell
Hodgman, C. E., & Jewett, M. C. (2012) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2011.09.002 · Cited by 425
Progress in biopharmaceutical development
Kesik‐Brodacka, M. (2018) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.1617 · Cited by 353
Ojima-Kato, T., Nagai, S., & Nakano, H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14277-0 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Zawada, J. F., Yin, G., Steiner, A. R., Yang, J., Naresh, A., Roy, S. M., Gold, D. S., Heinsohn, H. G., & Murray, C. J.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-31
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1570-1578
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2139398575
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.