Cited by 11Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFungal and yeast genetics research

Drug susceptibility of matrix‐encapsulated Candida albicans nano‐biofilms

Open access
Srinivasan, Anand, Gupta, Celia Macias, Agrawal, C. Mauli, Leung, Kai P., Lopez‐Ribot, Jose L., Ramasubramanian, Anand K.·2014·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

The rise in the use of biomedical devices and implants has seen a concomitant surge in the advent of device‐related nosocomial (hospital‐acquired) infections of bacterial and fungal origins. The most common nosocomial fungal infection is candidiasis caused mainly by Candida albicans biofilms. Candidiasis is associated with an unacceptably high mortality rate, and there is an urgent need for the discovery of new antifungal drugs that prevent or control biofilm formation. To this end, we recently developed an ultra‐high‐throughput microarray platform consisting of nano‐scale biofilms of C. albicans encapsulated in collagen or alginate hydrogel matrices for antifungal drug screening. Here, we report that the choice of matrix influences the apparent susceptibility of C. albicans to the common antifungal drugs, amphotericin B, and caspofungin. While amphotericin B is equally effective against biofilms grown in collagen and alginate matrices, caspofungin is effective only against biofilms grown only in alginate, but not in collagen. We demonstrate differences in the distribution of the drugs in the two matrices may contribute to the susceptibility of C. albicans nano‐biofilms. In a larger context, our results highlight the importance of the choice of matrix as a parameter in 3D cell encapsulation, and suggest a screening strategy to predict drug performance in vivo. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014;111: 418–424. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.25120

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Screens of chemical libraries have identified compounds that disrupt formation and/or maintenance of biofilms.

    “Screens of chemical libraries have identified compounds that disrupt formation and/or maintenance of biofilms (25, 101, 185, 210).”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [185]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Srinivasan, A., Gupta, C. M., Agrawal, C. M., Leung, K. P., Lopez‐Ribot, J. L., & Ramasubramanian, A. K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
  • United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (US)
  • Department of Biology The University of Texas at San Antonio San Antonio Texas
Corresponding author
Ramasubramanian, Anand K.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-18
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
418-424
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2132776307
Cited by
11
References
32
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01DE023510, SC1HL112629, G12RR01 3646)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida albicans, fungal biofilms, antifungal susceptibility, amphotericin B, caspofungin, collagen gel, alginate hydrogel, 3D cell encapsulation, antifungal drug screening, microarray platforms, device-related infection, candidiasis
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Biofilms, Cells, Immobilized, Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review