Cited by 7CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Efficient Multiplex Genome Editing of the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 via CRISPR‐Cas12a

Open access
Du, Wei, Meister, Luna L., van Grinsven, Tobias, Branco dos Santos, Filipe·2025·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

into biochemical products, but efficient genetic engineering tools, including CRISPR-Cas systems, remain limited. This is primarily due to the polyploid nature of cyanobacteria, which hinders their effectiveness. Here, we address the latter by specifically (i) modifying the RSF1010-based replicative plasmid to simplify cloning efforts while maintaining high conjugation efficiency; (ii) improving the design of the guide RNA (gRNA) to facilitate chromosomal cleavage; (iii) introducing template DNA fragments as pure plasmids via natural transformation; and (iv) using sacB to facilitate replicative plasmid curing. With this system, the replicative plasmid containing both Cas12a and gRNA is introduced to Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 cells via conjugation to cleave the circular chromosomes. Template DNA plasmid that has meanwhile been assimilated will then repair it achieving the desired genetic modifications. This system was validated by successfully deleting various "neutral" chromosomal loci, both individually and collectively, as well as targeting an essential gene, sll1797. With the sacB-sucrose counter-selection, all deletions were simultaneously made markerless in < 4 weeks. Moreover, we also integrate YFP with various protein degradation tags into the chromosome, allowing for their characterization at the chromosomal level. We foresee this system will greatly facilitate future genome engineering in cyanobacteria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.28910

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marker-free multiplex genome editing via optimised CRISPR-Cas12a has been demonstrated in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and the endogenous Type I-D CRISPR-Cas system of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 has been repurposed for scarless gene deletions using native cyanobacterial machinery.

    “Marker-free multiplex genome editing via optimised CRISPR-Cas12a has been demonstrated in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [122] and the endogenous Type I-D CRISPR-Cas system of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 has been repurposed for scarless gene deletions using native cyanobacterial machinery [123].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, W., Meister, L. L., van Grinsven, T., & Branco dos Santos, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Molecular Microbial Physiology Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-12-19
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
736-743
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W4405654692
Cited by
7
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, CRISPR/Cas12a, multiplex genome editing, conjugation, guide RNA design, natural transformation, plasmid curing, polyploidy
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Bacterial Proteins, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Plasmids, Genome, Bacterial, Synechocystis, CRISPR-Cas Systems, CRISPR-Associated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review