Cited by 106Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

The ploidy level of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is highly variable and is influenced by growth phase and by chemical and physical external parameters

Zerulla, Karolin, Ludt, Katharina, Soppa, Jörg·2016·Microbiology

Abstract

Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is a cyanobacterial model strain widely used to study many biological processes and is also applied for the production of biopolymers. Recently, it was reported that two of its substrains are highly polyploid. To test whether this can be generalized to the whole strain, six substrains were selected and their ploidy levels quantified. The ploidy levels of all substrains were highly growth phase regulated and the copy number was on average about 20 at an OD750 of 0.1 and about 4 at an OD750 of 2.5. In addition to growth phase, external conditions were found to influence the ploidy level, i.e. the copy number was elevated at lower light intensity and at higher phosphate concentrations (53 and 35 copies, respectively). In the absence of external phosphate, considerable growth was observed, although growth rate and growth yield were much lower than in the presence of either orthophosphate or genomic DNA as external source of phosphate. A rapid reduction in genome copy number was observed during growth in the absence of phosphate, indicating that replication ceased and genomes were distributed to the daughter cells. During prolonged incubation of stationary-phase cultures in the absence of phosphate, the cells eventually became monoploid. Taking the data together, the ploidy level of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is extremely variable and is influenced by both growth phase and physical and chemical environmental parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/mic.0.000264

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, ploidy is influenced by external conditions such as light intensity and phosphate availability, indicating that genome copy number is a dynamic physiological property rather than a fixed strain characteristic.

    “In Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, ploidy is also influenced by external conditions such as light intensity and phosphate availability, indicating that genome copy number is a dynamic physiological property rather than a fixed strain characteristic [203].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zerulla, K., Ludt, K., & Soppa, J.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Venue
Microbiology
Published
2016-05-01
Volume
162
Issue
5
Pages
730-739
ISSN
  • 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2080
OpenAlex
W2283216082
Cited by
106
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
9.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, polyploidy, genome copy number, growth phase, phosphate limitation, light intensity, cyanobacteria, genome replication, stationary phase, biopolymer production
MeSH terms
Phosphates, Polyploidy, Genome, Bacterial, Synechocystis, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review