The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral nutrition formulations in acute pancreatitis
Abstract
Background: Although the benefits of enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis are well established, the optimal composition of enteral feeding is largely unknown. The aim of the study was to compare the tolerance and safety of enteral nutrition formulations in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods: Electronic databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register) and the proceedings of major pancreatology conferences were searched. Results: Twenty randomized controlled trials, including 1070 patients, met the inclusion criteria. None of the following was associated with a significant difference in feeding intolerance: the use of (semi)elemental versus polymeric formulation (relative risk (RR) 0·62 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·10 to 3·97); P = 0·611); supplementation of enteral nutrition with probiotics (RR 0·69 (95 per cent c.i. 0·43 to 1·09); P = 0·110); or immunonutrition (RR 1·60 (95 per cent c.i. 0·31 to 8·29); P = 0·583). The risk of infectious complications and death did not differ significantly in any of the comparisons. Conclusion: The use of polymeric, compared with (semi)elemental, formulation does not lead to a significantly higher risk of feeding intolerance, infectious complications or death in patients with acute pancreatitis. Neither the supplementation of enteral nutrition with probiotics nor the use of immunonutrition significantly improves the clinical outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Geddes, J. R., Higgins, J. P., Churchill, R., Watanabe, N., Nakagawa, A., Omori, I. M., McGuire, H., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60046-5 · Cited by 1,654
Besselink, M. G., van Santvoort, H. C., Buskens, E., Boermeester, M. A., van Goor, H., Timmerman, H. M., Nieuwenhuijs, V. B., Bollen, T. L., van Ramshorst, B., Witteman, B. J., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60207-x · Cited by 1,367
Gupta, R., Patel, K., Calder, P. C., Yaqoob, P., Primrose, J. N., & Johnson, C. D. (2003) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1159/000073657 · Cited by 256
Eckerwall, G. E., Tingstedt, B. B. Å., Bergenzaun, P. E., & Andersson, R. G. (2007) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2007.04.007 · Cited by 227
Early Nasogastric Feeding in Predicted Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Clinical, Randomized Study
Eckerwall, G. E., Axelsson, J. B., & Andersson, R. G. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000246866.01930.58 · Cited by 195
Pupelis, G., Selga, G., Austrums, E., & Kaminski, A. (2001) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/s0899-9007(00)00508-6 · Cited by 129
SATHIARAJ, E., MURTHY, S., MANSARD, M. J., RAO, G. V., MAHUKAR, S., & REDDY, D. N. (2008) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03794.x · Cited by 121
Cited by
Arvanitakis, M., Dumonceau, J.-M., Albert, J., Badaoui, A., Bali, M., Barthet, M., Besselink, M., Deviere, J., Oliveira Ferreira, A., Gyökeres, T., et al. (2018) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/a-0588-5365 · Cited by 538
Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis
Greenberg, J. A., Hsu, J., Bawazeer, M., Marshall, J., Friedrich, J. O., Nathens, A., Coburn, N., May, G. R., Pearsall, E., & McLeod, R. S. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1503/cjs.015015 · Cited by 429
Nutrition in acute pancreatitis: a critical review
Lodewijkx, P. J., Besselink, M. G., Witteman, B. J., Schepers, N. J., Gooszen, H. G., van Santvoort, H. C., Bakker, O. J., & Pancreatitis, O. B. O. T. D. (2016) · Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1586/17474124.2016.1141048 · Cited by 67
Rohith, G., Sureshkumar, S., Anandhi, A., Kate, V., Rajesh, B. S., Abdulbasith, K. M., Nanda, N., Palanivel, C., & Vijayakumar, C. (2023) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-022-07618-1 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Petrov, M. S., Loveday, B. P. T., Pylypchuk, R. D., McIlroy, K., Phillips, A. R. J., & Windsor, J. A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-10-21
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1243-1252
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2093213888
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
