The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical innovations in surgery
Open accessAbstract
Background: In the past decade, there has been a major drive towards clinical translation of optical and, in particular, fluorescence imaging in surgery. In surgical oncology, radical surgery is characterized by the absence of positive resection margins, a critical factor in improving prognosis. Fluorescence imaging provides the surgeon with reliable and real-time intraoperative feedback to identify surgical targets, including positive tumour margins. It also may enable decisions on the possibility of intraoperative adjuvant treatment, such as brachytherapy, chemotherapy or emerging targeted photodynamic therapy (photoimmunotherapy). Methods: This article reviews the use of optical imaging for intraoperative guidance and decision-making. Results: Image-guided cancer surgery has the potential to be a powerful tool in guiding future surgical care. Photoimmunotherapy is a theranostic concept (simultaneous diagnosis and treatment) on the verge of clinical translation, and is highlighted as an effective combination of image-guided surgery and intraoperative treatment of residual disease. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography, a technique complementary to optical image-guided surgery, is currently being tested in humans and is anticipated to have great potential for perioperative and postoperative application in surgery. Conclusion: Significant advances have been achieved in real-time optical imaging strategies for intraoperative tumour detection and margin assessment. Optical imaging holds promise in achieving the highest percentage of negative surgical margins and in early detection of micrometastastic disease over the next decade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photoacoustic tomography: In vivo imaging from organelles to organs
Wang, L. V., & Hu, S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216210 · Cited by 4,331
Tumor cell metabolism: cancer's Achilles' heel
Kroemer, G., & Pouyssegur, J. (2008) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.005 · Cited by 2,337
Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology
Ntziachristos, V. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1483 · Cited by 1,896
Self-citation
Cited by
Nagaya, T., Nakamura, Y. A., Choyke, P. L., & Kobayashi, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2017.00314 · Cited by 398
Lamberts, L. E., Koch, M., de Jong, J. S., Adams, A. L. L., Glatz, J., Kranendonk, M. E. G., Terwisscha van Scheltinga, A. G. T., Jansen, L., de Vries, J., Lub-de Hooge, M. N., et al. (2017) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0437 · Cited by 285
Self-citationNanotechnology Strategies To Advance Outcomes in Clinical Cancer Care
Hartshorn, C. M., Bradbury, M. S., Lanza, G. M., Nel, A. E., Rao, J., Wang, A. Z., Wiesner, U. B., Yang, L., & Grodzinski, P. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b05108 · Cited by 258
Advances in Diagnostic and Intraoperative Molecular Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer
Tummers, W. S., Willmann, J. K., Bonsing, B. A., Vahrmeijer, A. L., Gambhir, S. S., & Swijnenburg, R.-J. (2018) · Pancreas · doi:10.1097/mpa.0000000000001075 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- de Boer, E., Harlaar, N. J., Taruttis, A., Nagengast, W. B., Rosenthal, E. L., Ntziachristos, V, & van Dam, G. M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e56-e72
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1543914022
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical innovations in surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.9713
- The paper
- de Boer, E., Harlaar, N. J., Taruttis, A., Nagengast, W. B., Rosenthal, E. L., Ntziachristos, V, & van Dam, G. M. (2015). Optical innovations in surgery. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9713
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.