Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanotechnology Strategies To Advance Outcomes in Clinical Cancer Care

Open access
Hartshorn, Christopher M., Bradbury, Michelle S., Lanza, Gregory M., Nel, Andre E., Rao, Jianghong, Wang, Andrew Z., Wiesner, Ulrich B., Yang, Lily, Grodzinski, Piotr·2018·ACS Nano

Abstract

Ongoing research into the application of nanotechnology for cancer treatment and diagnosis has demonstrated its advantages within contemporary oncology as well as its intrinsic limitations. The National Cancer Institute publishes the Cancer Nanotechnology Plan every 5 years since 2005. The most recent iteration helped codify the ongoing basic and translational efforts of the field and displayed its breadth with several evolving areas. From merely a technological perspective, this field has seen tremendous growth and success. However, an incomplete understanding of human cancer biology persists relative to the application of nanoscale materials within contemporary oncology. As such, this review presents several evolving areas in cancer nanotechnology in order to identify key clinical and biological challenges that need to be addressed to improve patient outcomes. From this clinical perspective, a sampling of the nano-enabled solutions attempting to overcome barriers faced by traditional therapeutics and diagnostics in the clinical setting are discussed. Finally, a strategic outlook of the future is discussed to highlight the need for next-generation cancer nanotechnology tools designed to address critical gaps in clinical cancer care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.7b05108

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 164 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Hartshorn, C. M., Bradbury, M. S., Lanza, G. M., Nel, A. E., Rao, J., Wang, A. Z., Wiesner, U. B., Yang, L., & Grodzinski, P.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2017-12-22
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
24-43
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2777643352
Cited by
258
References
164
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanotechnology Strategies To Advance Outcomes in Clinical Cancer Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsnano.7b05108
The paper
Hartshorn, C. M., Bradbury, M. S., Lanza, G. M., Nel, A. E., Rao, J., Wang, A. Z., Wiesner, U. B., Yang, L., & Grodzinski, P. (2018). Nanotechnology Strategies To Advance Outcomes in Clinical Cancer Care. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b05108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.