The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green consumption: Environmental knowledge, environmental consciousness, social norms, and purchasing behavior
Abstract
The 2015 Paris Agreement is the first historical global accord aiming to palliate global warming. Climate change has caused ecological, economic, and social disasters, among other things and has made not only nations review their environmental protection issues but also the consumers paying more attention to the environment and encouraging green oriented buying behaviors. This study targets Taiwan's consumers, and 649 valid questionnaires were recovered. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to extract the trait factors, whereas confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used for the verification of the scale and structural model, respectively. The result shows that the consumers' environmental knowledge, environmental consciousness, and the social norms have had a positive effect on their environmental attitude, as do their environmental knowledge and the social norms to a sense of well‐being. Consumers purchasing intention and behavior are pointing towards green products. Therefore, companies need to respond to the consumers' demand and fulfill their social responsibility to release the green products so as to satisfy the consumers' needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Collective action and the evolution of social norms.
Ostrom, E. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.137 · Cited by 4,195
Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro‐Forleo, G. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000006155 · Cited by 2,974
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021847 · Cited by 2,666
Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015) · International Strategic Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001 · Cited by 1,518
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2017) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019 · Cited by 1,318
Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour
Johnstone, M.-L., & Tan, L. P. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Influences of social norms on climate change-related behaviors
Cialdini, R. B., & Jacobson, R. P. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.01.005 · Cited by 337
The effects of consumer attitude on green purchase intention: A meta-analytic path analysis
Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ismail, N., Ahrari, S., & Abu Samah, A. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.053 · Cited by 312
Berki-Kiss, D., & Menrad, K. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.026 · Cited by 90
Lin, P.-H., & Chen, W.-H. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14148950 · Cited by 68
Does Greenwashing Wash Away Gen Z's Green Purchase Intention?
Di Pillo, F., Palombi, G., & Strazzullo, S. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.70064 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, S., & Niu, H.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-10-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1679-1688
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2894690375
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 27.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.