The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green process innovation: Where we are and where we are going
Open accessAbstract
Environmental pollution has worsened in the past few decades, and increasing pressure is being put on firms by different regulatory bodies, customer groups, NGOs and other media outlets to adopt green process innovations (GPcIs), which include clean technologies and end‐of‐pipe solutions. Although considerable studies have been published on GPcI, the literature is disjointed, and as such, a comprehensive understanding of the issues, challenges and gaps is lacking. A systematic literature review (SLR) involving 80 relevant studies was conducted to extract seven themes: strategic response, organisational learning, institutional pressures, structural issues, outcomes, barriers and methodological choices. The review thus highlights the various gaps in the GPcI literature and illuminates the pathways for future research by proposing a series of potential research questions. This study is of vital importance to business strategy as it provides a comprehensive framework to help firms understand the various contours of GPcI. Likewise, policymakers can use the findings of this study to fill in the loopholes in the existing regulations that firms are exploiting to circumvent taxes and other penalties by locating their operations to emerging economies with less stringent environmental regulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13 · Cited by 2,317
Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth
Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.807 · Cited by 1,341
Abu Seman, N. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Mat Saman, M. Z., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211 · Cited by 574
Resource management in big data initiatives: processes and dynamic capabilities
Braganza, A., Brooks, L., Nepelski, D., Ali, M., & Moro, R. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.006 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Aftab, J., Abid, N., Cucari, N., & Savastano, M. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3219 · Cited by 452
The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: Does digital economy agglomeration work?
Ren, S., Li, L., Han, Y., Hao, Y., & Wu, H. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2975 · Cited by 365
Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K., & Akhtar, S. (2021) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm14120605 · Cited by 128
Pathak, K., Prakash, G., Jain, M., Agarwal, R., & Attri, R. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3687 · Cited by 42
Esposito (2023) · doi:10.1002/bse.3115 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, S. J., Kaur, P., Jabeen, F., & Dhir, A.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-16
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3273-3296
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W3163509316
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 25.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green process innovation: Where we are and where we are going. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.2802
- The paper
- Khan, S. J., Kaur, P., Jabeen, F., & Dhir, A. (2021). Green process innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.