Cited by 1,341Innovation and Knowledge ManagementFirm Innovation and GrowthBusiness Strategies and Innovation

Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth

Open access
Leiponen, Aija, Helfat, Constance E.·2010·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

Given the inherent risk of innovative activity, firms can improve the odds of success by pursuing multiple parallel objectives. Because innovation draws on many sources of ideas, firms also may improve their odds of successful innovation by accessing a large number of knowledge sources. In this study, we conduct one of the first firm‐level statistical analyses of the impact on innovation of breadth in both innovation objectives and knowledge sources. The empirical results suggest that broader horizons with respect to innovation objectives and knowledge sources are associated with successful innovation. We do not find diminishing returns to breadth in innovation objectives, which suggests that firms may tend to search too narrowly. We interpret these results in light of well‐known cognitive biases toward searching in relatively familiar domains. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.807

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Helfat CE. 1994. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm research-and-development. Management Science 40(12): 1720-1747.
  2. Kauffman S. 1993. The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press: New York.
  3. Copyright  2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Strat. Mgmt. J., 31: 224-236 (2010) DOI: 10.1002/smj · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Helfat, Constance E.
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-22
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
224-236
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W2059804181
Cited by
1,341
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 68
FWCI
111.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Dartmouth College
  • York University
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
innovation objectives, knowledge sources, knowledge search, cognitive biases, innovation success, business innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review