The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of environmental management: from stage models to performance evaluation
Abstract
In the past two decades, academics and practitioners have attempted to improve understanding of environmental management by classifying companies' environmental behaviour, and evaluating their performance. Driven by both research and societal interest, this has resulted in a wave of stage or phase models, and a range of typologies. This article gives an overview of the development of such environmental management models, analysing their characteristics, strengths and weaknesses. An evolution can be noted in the direction of typologies and non‐linear models to deal with organizational and strategic complexities. Models are starting to pay more attention to the management side. To overcome problems of operationalization and limited company and sector specificity, environmental performance evaluation systems have emerged more recently. Although comprehensive performance assessments are still unavailable, the tenets of such a system can already be delineated. The paper presents these components, and draws conclusions on the contribution of environmental management models and performance evaluation systems. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9410210748 · Cited by 1,716
Cited by
Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1900 · Cited by 543
A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance
Kolk, A. (2004) · International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development · doi:10.1504/ijesd.2004.004688 · Cited by 409
Self-citationMorioka, S. N., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104 · Cited by 347
Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Is Entrepreneurial will Enough? A North–South Comparison
Spence, M., Ben Boubaker Gherib, J., & Ondoua Biwolé, V. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0656-1 · Cited by 281
Environmental strategies, upgrading and competitive advantage in global value chains
Marchi, V. D., Maria, E. D., & Micelli, S. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1738 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Kolk, A., & Mauser, A.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12-21
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-31
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2160210950
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of environmental management: from stage models to performance evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.316
- The paper
- Kolk, A., & Mauser, A. (2002). The evolution of environmental management: from stage models to performance evaluation. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.