The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring individual and institutional drivers of proactive environmentalism in the US Wine industry
Abstract
Industry transformation related to environmental stewardship proceeds through multiple stages, and there is as of yet no clear understanding of the importance of certain drivers of transformation at different stages. We bring together previous environmental management research regarding individual‐ and institutional‐level drivers of environmental stewardship to develop a model and series of questions regarding proactive environmental behavior in the US wine industry. A qualitative research method, including interviews and focus groups, is used to test the model. At the early stage of environmental transformation in the wine industry, we find that managerial attitudes and norms, existing regulations, employee welfare and competitive pressures are all strong drivers of proactive environmental behavior. However, our multi‐level analysis suggests that drivers of environmentalism vary in relevance and relative importance and that future environmental management research needs to consider the relationship between drivers of environmentalism and the stage of an industry's environmental transformation. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,003
The new institutionalism in organizational analysis
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5991 · Cited by 5,470
Cited by
Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · Cited by 2,586
Singh, S. K., Giudice, M. D., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762 · Cited by 2,100
Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line
Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035 · Cited by 1,019
Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Chong, T. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2277 · Cited by 1,018
Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9794-0 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, R. S., Cordano, M., & Silverman, M.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 92-109
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W1981833875
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 24.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring individual and institutional drivers of proactive environmentalism in the US Wine industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.433
- The paper
- Marshall, R. S., Cordano, M., & Silverman, M. (2005). Exploring individual and institutional drivers of proactive environmentalism in the US Wine industry. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.433
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
