The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviours – a conceptual framework for employee motivation
Abstract
Scholars in environmental management have called for better grounding of research on corporate greening within established organizational theories. We propose a conceptual framework (including suggestions for operationalizing it) that embeds empirical research within behavioural intent models and the concept of value‐creating prosocial behaviours. We argue that conceiving of corporate greening as a prosocial behaviour in this manner provides an improved understanding of the dominant factors that motivate employees to engage in ecoinitiatives. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,122
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,235
(1964) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,439
Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1
Ajzen, I. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x · Cited by 7,629
Cited by
Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2017) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21792 · Cited by 1,535
The Impact of Human Resource Management on Environmental Performance: An Employee-Level Study
Paillé, P., Chen, Y., Boiral, O., & Jin, J. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1732-0 · Cited by 1,041
Employee Green Behavior: A Theoretical Framework, Multilevel Review, and Future Research Agenda
Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615575773 · Cited by 981
Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management: linking two emerging agendas
Jabbour, C. J. C., & de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.052 · Cited by 889
Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E., & Ployhart, R. E. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314547386 · Cited by 698
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramus, C. A., & Killmer, A. B. C.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-19
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 554-570
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W1969708357
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviours – a conceptual framework for employee motivation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bse.504
- The paper
- Ramus, C. A., & Killmer, A. B. C. (2007). Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviours – a conceptual framework for employee motivation. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
