The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Carbon Strategies in Responding to Climate Change
Abstract
With climate change emerging as one of the most important issues affecting the business circle, companies have begun considering the carbon issue in their overall strategic positioning. However, few studies have examined the corporate carbon strategies in developing and advanced developing countries, where climate change regulation is extensive and market uncertainty is relatively high. In addition, there has been growing interest among researchers and practitioners concerning the relationship between the carbon strategy and firm performance. This paper presents a framework for identifying the corporate carbon strategy. The cluster analysis of 241 Korean companies indicates six types of corporate carbon strategy: ‘wait‐and‐see observer’, ‘cautious reducer’, ‘product enhancer’, ‘all‐round enhancer’, ‘emergent explorer’ and ‘all‐round explorer’. This study empirically examines whether there are differences between these carbon strategy types in terms of the sector, firm size and firm performance. The results indicate a significant relationship between a firm's carbon strategy and its sector and size but a significant relationship between the carbon strategy and firm performance is not confirmed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9410210748 · Cited by 1,716
Cited by
Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries
Alam, M. S., Atif, M., Chien-Chi, C., & Soytaş, U. (2019) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.031 · Cited by 438
Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges
Schaltegger, S., & Csutora, M. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.024 · Cited by 408
Wong, S. K. S. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1746 · Cited by 356
Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies
Cadez, S., Czerny, A., & Letmathe, P. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2070 · Cited by 334
Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: The Role of Emission Reductions
Lewandowski, S. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1978 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, S.
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-28
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-48
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W1891879416
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 32.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.