Cited by 85Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Challenges in implementing evidence-based treatment practices for co-occurring disorders in the criminal justice system

Chandler, Redonna K., Peters, Roger H., Field, Gary, Juliano‐Bult, Denise·2004·Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Abstract

The presence of adults with mental health and substance abuse disorders within the criminal justice system has become increasingly evident over the past decade. Interventions and treatment services have been designed and research conducted in an effort to establish evidence‐based practices that effectively address the complex needs of this population. However, adopting and implementing these evidence‐based interventions and practices within the real‐world setting of criminal justice environments is challenging. This article reviews the research literature related to evidence‐based treatment practices for offenders with co‐occurring mental health and substance abuse disorders and explores the inherent challenges of fitting these interventions and services within criminal justice settings. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bsl.598

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Therapists sometimes question the relevance or effectiveness of EBT for their specific populations or struggle to deliver them with engagement difficulties, crises, or comorbidities.

    “therapists sometimes question the relevance or effectiveness of EBT for their specific populations or struggle to deliver them when presented with engagement difficulties, crises, or comorbidities (Chandler, Peters, Field, & Juliano-bult, 2004; Kazdin, 2008; Whaley & Davis, 2007)”

    From User‐centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation. (2016) · cites this paper as Chandler, Peters, Field, & Juliano-bult, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandler, R. K., Peters, R. H., Field, G., & Juliano‐Bult, D.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Chandler, Redonna K.
Venue
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
431-448
ISSN
  • 0735-3936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0798
OpenAlex
W2170742574
Cited by
85
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Sciences & the Law (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
co-occurring disorders, evidence-based treatment, criminal justice system, offenders, mental illness, substance use disorders, implementation barriers, treatment services, prison environment
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Criminal Law, Humans, Mental Health Services, Comorbidity, Evidence-Based Medicine, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review