Disability as diversity infortune 100 companies
Abstract
To investigate the inclusion of people with disabilities in the diversity policies of the most successful businesses in the United States, we examined the publicly available workforce and supplier diversity policies of the top 100 companies on Fortune Magazine's 2003 list of the 500 most profitable companies in the nation. The majority of these companies have extensive information about their diversity policies and practices available on their corporate website. The information was used to categorize the policies into those that include people with disabilities, do not define diversity, and enumerate what is meant by diversity (e.g. in terms of race or gender) but do not expressly mention disability. In addition, we looked beyond the diversity policies to information available on corporate websites relating to a variety of diversity initiatives. Findings suggest that the majority of the companies that top the Fortune 500 list have developed and implemented diversity policies. Of these, 42% have diversity policies that include people with disabilities in the definition of a diverse workforce. Furthermore, 47% of companies with workplace diversity policies discuss diversity in a way that neither expressly includes nor excludes people with disabilities. Far fewer (15%) supplier diversity policies include disability in the definition of diversity, but a significant number of companies use criteria that allow a business owner with a disability to benefit from the company's supplier diversity program.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An analysis of the diversity statements at Fortune 500 companies revealed that fewer than half included people with disabilities in their description of diversity.
“an analysis of the diversity statements at Fortune 500 companies revealed that fewer than half included people with disabilities in their description of diversity”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Ball, Monaco, Schmeling, Schartz, & Blanck, 2005
Disability is often left out of diversity and inclusion statements.
“As noted above, disability is often left out of these statements”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Ball et al., 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Is Disability Disabling in All Workplaces? Workplace Disparities and Corporate Culture
SCHUR, L., KRUSE, D., BLASI, J., & BLANCK, P. (2009) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.1468-232x.2009.00565.x · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Self-citationCavanagh, J., Bartram, T., Meacham, H., Bigby, C., Oakman, J., & Fossey, E. (2017) · Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12111 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Tomczak, M. T. (2021) · Journal of Disability Policy Studies · doi:10.1177/1044207320919945 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Solovieva, T. I., Walls, R. T., Hendricks, D. J., & Dowler, D. L. (2009) · Disability and Health Journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.04.002 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The Role of Human Values and Relations in the Employment of People with Work-Relevant Disabilities
Kuiper, L., Bakker, M., & Van der Klink, J. (2016) · Social Inclusion · doi:10.17645/si.v4i4.696 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ball, P., Monaco, G., Schmeling, J., Schartz, H., & Blanck, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blanck, Peter
- ORCID
- Blanck, Peter
- Venue
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-121
- ISSN
- 0735-3936 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0798
- OpenAlex
- W2016225711
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Keywords
- disability, workplace diversity, Fortune 500 companies, corporate diversity policy, supplier diversity, disability discrimination, inclusive employment, corporate websites
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Employment, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, United States, Organizational Culture, Cultural Diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review