Cited by 100Disability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and RepresentationGender Diversity and Inequality

Disability as diversity infortune 100 companies

Ball, Phoebe, Monaco, Gregory, Schmeling, James, Schartz, Helen, Blanck, Peter·2005·Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Abstract

To investigate the inclusion of people with disabilities in the diversity policies of the most successful businesses in the United States, we examined the publicly available workforce and supplier diversity policies of the top 100 companies on Fortune Magazine's 2003 list of the 500 most profitable companies in the nation. The majority of these companies have extensive information about their diversity policies and practices available on their corporate website. The information was used to categorize the policies into those that include people with disabilities, do not define diversity, and enumerate what is meant by diversity (e.g. in terms of race or gender) but do not expressly mention disability. In addition, we looked beyond the diversity policies to information available on corporate websites relating to a variety of diversity initiatives. Findings suggest that the majority of the companies that top the Fortune 500 list have developed and implemented diversity policies. Of these, 42% have diversity policies that include people with disabilities in the definition of a diverse workforce. Furthermore, 47% of companies with workplace diversity policies discuss diversity in a way that neither expressly includes nor excludes people with disabilities. Far fewer (15%) supplier diversity policies include disability in the definition of diversity, but a significant number of companies use criteria that allow a business owner with a disability to benefit from the company's supplier diversity program.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bsl.629

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ball, P., Monaco, G., Schmeling, J., Schartz, H., & Blanck, P.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Blanck, Peter
Venue
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
97-121
ISSN
  • 0735-3936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0798
OpenAlex
W2016225711
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Sciences & the Law (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
Keywords
disability, workplace diversity, Fortune 500 companies, corporate diversity policy, supplier diversity, disability discrimination, inclusive employment, corporate websites
MeSH terms
Workforce, Employment, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, United States, Organizational Culture, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review