Cited by 13Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchProtein purification and stabilitySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

A rapid novel strategy for screening of antibody phage libraries for production, purification, and functional characterization of amber stop codons containing single-chain antibody fragments

Perween, Reshma, Ahmed, Shubbir, Shrivastava, Tripti, Parray, Hilal A., Singh, Balwant, Pindari, Kamal S., Sharma, Chandresh, Shukla, Shivangi +3 more·2021·Biotechnology Progress

Abstract

Phage display antibody (PDA) libraries, allows the rapid isolation and characterization of high specificity monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. However, selection of positive binding clones from synthetic and semi-synthetic libraries has an inherent bias towards clones containing randomly generated amber stop codons, complicating the identification of high affinity binding antibodies. We screened Tomlinson I and J library against receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS CoV2, eight clones which showed positive binding in phage ELISA, contained one or more amber stop codons in their single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) gene sequences. The presence of amber stop codons within the antibody sequence causes the premature termination of soluble form of scFv expression in nonsuppressor Escherichia coli strain. In the present study, we have used a novel strategy that allows soluble expression of scFvs having amber stop codon in their gene sequences (without phage PIII protein fusion), in the suppressor strain. This strategy of introduction of Ochre (TAA) codon at the junction of scFv and PIII gene, speeds up the initial screening process which is critical for selecting the right scFvs for further studies. Present strategy leads to the identification of a scFv, B8 that binds specifically with nanomolar affinity toward SARS CoV 2 RBD, which otherwise lost in terms of traditional methodology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/btpr.3136

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perween, R., Ahmed, S., Shrivastava, T., Parray, H. A., Singh, B., Pindari, K. S., Sharma, C., Shukla, S., Sinha, S., Panchal, A. K., & Kumar, R.
Affiliations
  • Translational Health Science and Technology Institute (IN)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Rajesh
Venue
Biotechnology Progress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-08
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
e3136-e3136
ISSN
  • 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-7938
OpenAlex
W3129483641
Cited by
13
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology Progress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Biotechnology, Government of West Bengal (T001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
phage display, amber stop codon, single-chain antibody fragments, scFv, SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain, monoclonal antibody screening, nanomolar affinity
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Bacteriophages, Humans, Immunoglobulin Variable Region, Protein Binding, RNA, Viral, Codon, Terminator, Peptide Library, Single-Chain Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review