A rapid novel strategy for screening of antibody phage libraries for production, purification, and functional characterization of amber stop codons containing single-chain antibody fragments
Abstract
Phage display antibody (PDA) libraries, allows the rapid isolation and characterization of high specificity monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. However, selection of positive binding clones from synthetic and semi-synthetic libraries has an inherent bias towards clones containing randomly generated amber stop codons, complicating the identification of high affinity binding antibodies. We screened Tomlinson I and J library against receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS CoV2, eight clones which showed positive binding in phage ELISA, contained one or more amber stop codons in their single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) gene sequences. The presence of amber stop codons within the antibody sequence causes the premature termination of soluble form of scFv expression in nonsuppressor Escherichia coli strain. In the present study, we have used a novel strategy that allows soluble expression of scFvs having amber stop codon in their gene sequences (without phage PIII protein fusion), in the suppressor strain. This strategy of introduction of Ochre (TAA) codon at the junction of scFv and PIII gene, speeds up the initial screening process which is critical for selecting the right scFvs for further studies. Present strategy leads to the identification of a scFv, B8 that binds specifically with nanomolar affinity toward SARS CoV 2 RBD, which otherwise lost in terms of traditional methodology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Significant challenges remain in optimizing the experimental antibody workflow despite reported strategies.
“Although several strategies to optimize the experimental workflow have been reported [3,4], significant challenges remain.”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
Smith, G. P. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4001944 · Cited by 4,143 · see citing works
Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases
Lu, R., Hwang, Y., Liu, I.-J., Lee, C., Tsai, H.-Z., Li, H., & Wu, H. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-019-0592-z · Cited by 2,106 · see citing works
Antibody fragments from a ‘single pot’ phage display library as immunochemical reagents.
Nissim, A., Hoogenboom, H. R., Tomlinson, I. M., Flynn, G., Midgley, C., Lane, D. P., & Winter, G. P. (1994) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06308.x · Cited by 574 · see citing works
A compact phage display human scFv library for selection of antibodies to a wide variety of antigens
Pansri, P., Jaruseranee, N., Rangnoi, K., et al. (2009) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/1472-6750-9-6 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Hu, D., Hu, S., Wan, W., Xu, M., Du, R., Zhao, W., Gao, X., Liu, J., Liu, H., & Hong, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129125 · Cited by 86 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The codon usage for mutagenesis in CDRs of these libraries (synthetic or semi-synthetic) are often NNN, NNK, NWG, NWC, and NSG codons, which increase the frequency and chance of incorporation of amber codon into CDRs.(9,10) According to the binomial distribution of codons there are chances that 25% of phage ELISA posi…”
BackgroundKumar, R., Parray, H., Shrivastava, T., Sinha, S., & Luthra, K. (2019) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.006 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationParray, H. A., Chiranjivi, A. K., Asthana, S., Yadav, N., Shrivastava, T., Mani, S., Sharma, C., Vishwakarma, P., Das, S., Pindari, K. S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ac120.014918 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationHuang, R. R., Fang, P., & Kay, B. K. (2012) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.08.008 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Advances in the production and batch reformatting of phage antibody libraries
Reader, R. H., Workman, R. G., Maddison, B. C., & Gough, K. C. (2019) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-019-00207-0 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Barderas, R., Shochat, S. G., Martinez-Torrecuadrada, J. L., et al. (2006) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jim.2006.03.005 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Yan, J., Ko, J. H., & Qi, Y. P. (2004) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2004.06.013 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A novel strategy for efficient production of anti-V3 human scFvs against HIV-1 clade C
Kumar, R., Andrabi, R., Tiwari, A., Prakash, S. S., Wig, N., Dutta, D., Sankhyan, A., Khan, L., Sinha, S., & Luthra, K. (2012) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/1472-6750-12-87 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationA fast and efficient procedure to produce scFvs specific for large macromolecular complexes
Wu, S., Ke, A., & Doudna, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jim.2006.10.005 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Kumar, R., Kumari, R., Khan, L., Sankhyan, A., Parray, H. A., Tiwari, A., Wig, N., Sinha, S., & Luthra, K. (2018) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12010-018-2862-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationMarcus, W. D., Lindsay, S. M., & Sierks, M. R. (2006) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp050420y · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development
Kim, J., McFee, M., Fang, Q., Abdin, O., & Kim, P. M. (2023) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2022.12.005 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
- Authors
- Perween, R., Ahmed, S., Shrivastava, T., Parray, H. A., Singh, B., Pindari, K. S., Sharma, C., Shukla, S., Sinha, S., Panchal, A. K., & Kumar, R.
- Affiliations
- Translational Health Science and Technology Institute (IN)
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kumar, Rajesh
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-03-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e3136-e3136
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W3129483641
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biotechnology Progress (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Biotechnology, Government of West Bengal (T001)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Keywords
- phage display, amber stop codon, single-chain antibody fragments, scFv, SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain, monoclonal antibody screening, nanomolar affinity
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Bacteriophages, Humans, Immunoglobulin Variable Region, Protein Binding, RNA, Viral, Codon, Terminator, Peptide Library, Single-Chain Antibodies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review