Cited by 86Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchChemical Synthesis and Analysisvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Effective Optimization of Antibody Affinity by Phage Display Integrated with High-Throughput DNA Synthesis and Sequencing Technologies

Open access
Hu, Dongmei, Hu, Siyi, Wan, Wen, Xu, Man, Du, Ruikai, Zhao, Wei, Gao, Xiaolian, Liu, Jing +2 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Phage display technology has been widely used for antibody affinity maturation for decades. The limited library sequence diversity together with excessive redundancy and labour-consuming procedure for candidate identification are two major obstacles to widespread adoption of this technology. We hereby describe a novel library generation and screening approach to address the problems. The approach started with the targeted diversification of multiple complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of a humanized anti-ErbB2 antibody, HuA21, with a small perturbation mutagenesis strategy. A combination of three degenerate codons, NWG, NWC, and NSG, were chosen for amino acid saturation mutagenesis without introducing cysteine and stop residues. In total, 7,749 degenerate oligonucleotides were synthesized on two microchips and released to construct five single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) gene libraries with 4 x 10(6) DNA sequences. Deep sequencing of the unselected and selected phage libraries using the Illumina platform allowed for an in-depth evaluation of the enrichment landscapes in CDR sequences and amino acid substitutions. Potent candidates were identified according to their high frequencies using NGS analysis, by-passing the need for the primary screening of target-binding clones. Furthermore, a subsequent library by recombination of the 10 most abundant variants from four CDRs was constructed and screened, and a mutant with 158-fold increased affinity (Kd = 25.5 pM) was obtained. These results suggest the potential application of the developed methodology for optimizing the binding properties of other antibodies and biomolecules.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0129125

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conventional in vitro affinity maturation usually takes a long time with poor efficiency due to its small library content, incompatible optimization for multiple goals, and other technical obstacles.

    “The conventional in vitro affinity maturation usually takes a long time with poor efficiency due to its small library content, incompatible optimization for multiple goals, and other technical obstacles (32, 49).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, D., Hu, S., Wan, W., Xu, M., Du, R., Zhao, W., Gao, X., Liu, J., Liu, H., & Hong, J.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Haiyan
  • Hong, Jiong
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-06-05
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e0129125
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128673241
Cited by
86
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • University of Science and Technology of China
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
affinity maturation, phage display, saturation mutagenesis, degenerate oligonucleotides, single-chain antibody fragments
MeSH terms
Antibody Affinity, Base Sequence, Humans, Gene Library, Mutagenesis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Peptide Library, Complementarity Determining Regions, Single-Chain Antibodies, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review