The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
Open accessAbstract
"Biodiversity or biological diversity means the variability among living organisms from all sources including, inter alia, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems" (Convention on Biological Diversity, Art. 2, para. 1). The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (www.gbif.org) mission is to make the world's biodiversity data freely and universally available via the Internet. GBIF was established and is being maintained by an ever-growing consortium of forward-thinking countries, economies and international organizations. Its charge is to carry out specific tasks that are essential to a worldwide infrastructure that can overcome current barriers to the universal availability of species-level biodiversity information. Significant parts of the tripartite (gene, species, ecosystem) biodiversity information resource are already online, such as the DNA data served by GenBank, EMBL and DDBJ and other sequence (RNA, protein, etc.) data served by various sources such as RNAbase, SCOR and ExPASy. These community research resources have already contributed substantially to medical, pharmaceutical and agricultural industries and through these to society, which has footed the bills for the establishment and maintenance of the digital information resources. Ecological, ecosystem and planet-wide data are provided online by, for example, MABnet and LTERnet, the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through its Mission to Planet Earth (MPE) and other national and bi- or trilateral consortia. These online ecological resources are just beginning to be thoroughly analyzed and the results synthesized into larger understandings of the functioning of the natural systems of our planet. Nonetheless, they hold great promise for predictive modeling of global climate change and other large-scale ecological phenomena. Though there are areas of the world that still do not have either full access to the Internet or the onsite infrastructure to fully utilize data that might be received (one hopes that this situation will be rectified in the near future), the molecular and ecological data discussed above are available to anyone and everyone with an Internet connection. One of the reasons that this is so is that the available data have all been collected in the past few decades, during the age of computers. The piece, in fact the anchor stone, of biodiversity information that to-date has been missing from digital availability is data about individuals, populations and species of whole organisms. These data are not online because most pre-date the computer age. They have been collected over nearly three centuries and recorded in the only medium available: paper and ink. These data are on the labels of natural history specimens, in libraries and in handwritten notebooks or typewritten card files. Species-occurrence data are essential to many kinds of analyses, and one of GBIF's four major areas of work is aimed at making these data digital and therefore more useful and available. All of GBIF's tasks are aimed at making digitally available the bridging pieces (data about individuals, populations and species) that tie the whole biodiversity information pattern together (see Figure 1). Without the Taxonomic Name Service (a function that uses both the Registry of Shared Biodiversity Information and the Electronic Catalogue of Scientific Names) that will be provided by GBIF, there is no way to obtain a seamless response to a query that requires a call upon both ecological and molecular data, such as "What other organisms live in the same kinds of habitats as this one from which I have extracted a gene that enables it to tolerate high levels of lead acetate, and are able to do so because of either homologous or analogous gene function?" The pieces of biodiversity (gene, species, ecosystems) information. The tasks that GBIF will carry out provide the center pieces that tie the other pieces together. Each of the three information sub-domains (gene, species, ecosystems) will want to generate its own specialized search engines. However, the Electronic Calalogue of Scientific Names is a GBIF partnership task that will facilitate searches across all the sub-domains for a single query because a scientific name is often the only data field common to databases in all three sub-domains. It can also alleviate some of the faced by sequence databases regarding taxonomic classifications (dotted arrow, uper left). Because primary specimine data can be analyzed to predict the characteristics of a species' habitat, queries about the ecological role of particular genes can be posed. Rapid answers to search questions have never before been possible. The registry of shared biodiversity data facilitates searching and can serve as a major link among the sub-domains and to the growing digital library of biodiv
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life
Hinchliff, C. E., Smith, S. A., Allman, J. F., Burleigh, J. G., Chaudhary, R., Coghill, L. M., Crandall, K. A., Deng, J., Drew, B. T., Gazis, R., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1423041112 · Cited by 788
Shabani, F., Kumar, L., & Ahmadi, M. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2332 · Cited by 319
GIFT – A Global Inventory of Floras and Traits for macroecology and biogeography
Weigelt, P., König, C., & Kreft, H. (2020) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.13623 · Cited by 268
Pollen–Food Allergy Syndrome: Allergens, Clinical Insights, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges
Haidar, L., Bănărescu, C. F., Uța, C., Moldovan, S. I., Zimbru, E.-L., Zimbru, R.-I., Ciurariu, E., Georgescu, M., & Panaitescu, C. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15010066 · Cited by 21
Morchón, R., Rodríguez-Escolar, I., Lambraño, R. E. H., Agudo, J. Á. S., Montoya-Alonso, J. A., Serafín-Pérez, I., Fernández-Serafín, C., & Carretón, E. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13203251 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Lane, M. A.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-24
- ISSN
- 0095-4403 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-8366
- OpenAlex
- W2046134920
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bult.301
- The paper
- Lane, M. A. (2003). The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.