Cited by 59Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismCancer and biochemical research

Restoring physiological levels of ascorbate slows tumor growth and moderates HIF‐1 pathway activity in Gulo−/− mice

Open access
Campbell, Elizabeth J., Vissers, Margreet C. M., Bozonet, Stephanie, Dyer, Arron, Robinson, Bridget A, Dachs, Gabi U.·2015·Cancer Medicine

Abstract

Hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1 (HIF‐1) governs cellular adaption to the hypoxic microenvironment and is associated with a proliferative, metastatic, and treatment‐resistant tumor phenotype. HIF‐1 levels and transcriptional activity are regulated by proline and asparagine hydroxylases, which require ascorbate as cofactor. Ascorbate supplementation reduced HIF‐1 activation in vitro, but only limited data are available in relevant animal models. There is no information of the effect of physiological levels of ascorbate on HIF activity and tumor growth, which was measured in this study. C57 BL/6 Gulo−/− mice (a model of the human ascorbate dependency condition) were supplemented with 3300 mg/L, 330 mg/L, or 33 mg/L of ascorbate in their drinking water before and during subcutaneous tumor growth of B16‐F10 melanoma or Lewis lung carcinoma (LL/2). Ascorbate levels in tumors increased significantly with elevated ascorbate intake and restoration of wild‐type ascorbate levels led to a reduction in growth of B16‐F10 (log phase P < 0.001) and LL/2 tumors (lag growth P < 0.001, log phase P < 0.05). Levels of HIF‐1 α protein in tumors decreased as dietary ascorbate supplementation increased for both tumor models (P < 0.001). Similarly, tumor ascorbate was inversely correlated with levels of the HIF‐1 target proteins CA‐IX, GLUT‐1, and VEGF in both B16‐F10 and LL/2 tumors (P < 0.05). The extent of necrosis was similar between ascorbate groups but varied between models (30% for B16‐F10 and 21% for LL/2), indicating that ascorbate did not affect tumor hypoxia. Our data support the hypothesis that restoration of optimal intracellular ascorbate levels reduces tumor growth via moderation of HIF‐1 pathway activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cam4.349

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Gulo−/− mice, lung carcinoma grew slower with high-dose ascorbate (3.3 g/L drinking water or 1 g/kg daily intraperitoneal) than with low-dose ascorbate (0.33 g/L), and high-dose tumours had less HIF1α, VEGF, and microvessel density.

    “lung carcinoma implanted in Gulo−/− mice grew slowly when mice were treated with high-dose ascorbate either in drinking water (3.3 g per litre) or daily intraperitoneal injection (1 gkg−1) as compared with Gulo−/− mice treated with low-dose ascorbate in drinking water (0.33 g per litre), and tumours exposed to high-dose ascorbate also had reduced expression levels of HIF1α, VEGF and reduced microv”

    From Targeting cancer vulnerabilities with high-dose vitamin C (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, E. J., Vissers, M. C. M., Bozonet, S., Dyer, A., Robinson, B. A., & Dachs, G. U.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Canterbury District Health Board (NZ)
Corresponding author
Dachs, Gabi U.
Venue
Cancer Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-30
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
303-314
ISSN
2045-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992980936
Cited by
59
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Council of New Zealand (11/460)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer and biochemical research
Keywords
vitamin C, vitamin C supplementation, HIF-1, HIF-1α, tumor growth, B16F10 melanoma, Lewis lung carcinoma, proline hydroxylase, CAIX, GLUT1, vascular endothelial growth factor, tumor hypoxia, tumor necrosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Ascorbic Acid, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Melanoma, Experimental, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Vitamins, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Carcinoma, Lewis Lung, Cell Proliferation, Glucose Transporter Type 1, Mice, Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review