The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processes of social learning in integrated resources management
Abstract
In recent years the human dimension and governance issues have gained more and more in importance in the management of natural resources. One important aspect is to understand the processes of social learning that precede any collective decision‐making. The HarmoniCOP project developed a framework for social learning for resources management that can be interpreted as combining content management as well as social involvement processes to achieve both technical and relational outcomes. Social learning was taken into account in a new approach called participatory agent based social simulation. Participatory agent based social simulation deviates in a number of ways from conventional modelling. The actors themselves whose behaviour is represented in the model and who are supposed to later use the models for decision‐making and strategic planning, participate and contribute to the modelling process. Models serve as tools of communication in processes of social learning. This article reports on a Swiss case study which dealt with the development of new management strategies for urban water management. It will provide examples of how different techniques can be used to establish a process of social learning within a long‐term participatory management project using participatory agent‐based social simulation. Social learning is highlighted as important for management regimes that require changes in social practices, roles and responsibilities. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Challenge of Collaborative Governance
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000) · Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory · doi:10.1080/14719030000000021 · Cited by 455
Cited by
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management
Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399713481601 · Cited by 1,514
Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems
Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01606-110119 · Cited by 1,377
Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007 · Cited by 1,354
Šūmane, S., Kunda, I., Knickel, K., Strauss, A., Tisenkopfs, T., Rios, I. D. I., Rivera, M., Chebach, T., & Ashkenazy, A. (2018) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020 · Cited by 749
The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions: Ten Years Later
Folke, C., Pritchard, Jr., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (2007) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02064-120130 · Cited by 710
How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: A review
Duru, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M.-A., Justes, E., Journet, E.-P., Aubertot, J.-N., Savary, S., Bergez, J.-E., et al. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0306-1 · Cited by 659
Designing agroecological transitions; A review
Duru, M., Therond, O., & Fares, M. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x · Cited by 542
Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future
BERKES, F. (2010) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s037689291000072x · Cited by 377
Jakku, E., & Thorburn, P. J. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.08.007 · Cited by 204
Butler, C., & Adamowski, J. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.010 · Cited by 164
How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods
Berthet, E. T. A., Barnaud, C., Girard, N., Labatut, J., & Martin, G. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627 · Cited by 159
An Introduction to Polycentricity and Governance
Stephan, M., Marshall, G., & McGinnis, M. (2019) · Governing Complexity · doi:10.1017/9781108325721.002 · Cited by 112
Duru, M., Fares, M., & Therond, O. (2014) · Cahiers Agricultures · doi:10.1684/agr.2014.0691 · Cited by 63
Holifield, R., & Williams, K. C. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.081 · Cited by 62
Thiel, A., & Moser, C. (2019) · Governing Complexity · doi:10.1017/9781108325721.004 · Cited by 58
ElSawah, S., Mclucas, A., & Mazanov, J. (2013) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0357-5 · Cited by 32
The Faustian Bargain: Power-Sharing, Constitutions, and the Practice of Polycentricity in Governance
Tarko, V., Schlager, E., & Lutter, M. (2019) · Governing Complexity · doi:10.1017/9781108325721.011 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Pahl‐Wostl, C., & Hare, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-206
- ISSN
- 1052-9284 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1298
- OpenAlex
- W2030702018
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
