Cited by 936Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorConsumer Retail Behavior Studies

Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption

O'Cass, Aron, McEwen, Hmily·2004·Journal of Consumer Behaviour

Abstract

In seeking to expand an understanding of consumption, this study assesses the relationship between status consumption and conspicuous consumption. Theoretically, the relationship between status consumption and conspicuous consumption is problematic and, therefore, the main focus of this paper examines the theoretical and empirical separation of consumers' status consumption and conspicuous consumption. Data were gathered via a survey of individuals aged between 18 and 25. The findings indicate that status consumption and conspicuous consumption are distinct constructs. Differences in status consumption tendencies between males and females were not found; however, in relation to conspicuous consumption gender differences were found. Status consumption was affected by self‐monitoring and interpersonal influences, but conspicuous consumption was affected only by interpersonal influences. The brands examined also clearly differed in terms of status and conspicuous consumption perceptions. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cb.155

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1108/10610429810216874 · DOI
  2. Bagwell L. S., 1996, ‘Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption’, The American Economic Review, 86, 349
  3. Bansanko D., 1995, ‘The kinder, gentler, richer American’, American Demographics, 17, 46
  4. 10.1086/209186 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1108/10610429810222831 · DOI
  6. Belk R. W., 1978, ‘Assessing the effects of visible consumption patterns on impression formation’, Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 39
  7. Bell S. S., 1991, ‘Combining esthetic and social value to explain preferences for product styles with incorporation of personality and ensemble effects’, in ‘To Have Possessions: A Handbook on Ownership and Property’, Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 6, 243
  8. 10.1086/261957 · DOI
  9. Bourdieu P., 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste
  10. Calder B. J., 1981, ‘Designing research for application’, Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 197, 10.1086/208856 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1300/J050v07n04_02 · DOI
  12. Converse J.andPresser S.(1986)‘Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardised questionnaire’ Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Sage Publications Beverly Hills CA.
  13. Dittmar H., 1992, The Social Psychology of Material Possessions
  14. 10.1108/eb008208 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/10696679.1997.11501750 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/10696679.1999.11501839 · DOI
  17. Echikson W., 1994, ‘The return of luxury’, Fortune, 130
  18. 10.1086/208679 · DOI
  19. Ferstman C., 1992, ‘Social status, culture and economic performance’
  20. 10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00057-5 · DOI
  21. Fornell C., 1994, Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, 58
  22. 10.2307/1251326 · DOI
  23. Goldsmith R., 1996, Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Proceedings, 309
  24. 10.1108/10610429910257904 · DOI
  25. Gould S., 1993, ‘Assessing self‐concept discrepancy in consumer behavior: The joint effect of private self‐consciousness and self‐monitoring’, Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 419
  26. 10.1080/00224545.1988.9713756 · DOI
  27. Holman R., 1981, Review of Marketing, 106
  28. Kairser S. B., 1990, The Social Psychology of Apparel
  29. Kelly R. F., 1987, Advances in Nonprofit Marketing, 1
  30. Kilsheimer J.(1993)Status Consumption: The Development and Implications of a Scale Measuring the Motivation to Consume for Status a dissertation submitted to the Marketing Faculty at Florida State University FL.
  31. Levine J., 1997, ‘Badass sells’, Forbes
  32. 10.1108/10610420110388672 · DOI
  33. Lurie A., 1981, The Language of Clothes
  34. 10.1300/J046v09n04_02 · DOI
  35. Mason R., 1981, Conspicuous Consumption: A Study of Exceptional Consumer Behaviour
  36. Mason R., 1992, Modeling the Demand for Status Goods
  37. McCraken G., 1988, Culture and Consumption
  38. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200005)17:5<397::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S1441-3582(01)70166-8 · DOI
  40. O'Shaughnessy J., 1992, Explaining Buyer Behaviour, 10.1093/oso/9780195071085.001.0001 · DOI
  41. Packard V., 1959, The Status Seekers
  42. 10.2307/2956866 · DOI
  43. 10.1300/J054v06n01_02 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/1467-8616.00085 · DOI
  45. Ram J., 1994, ‘Luxury goods firms find a haven in Asia’, Asian Business, 30, 52
  46. Shermach K., 1997, ‘What consumers wish brand managers knew’, Marketing News, 31
  47. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60260-9 · DOI
  48. 10.1086/208971 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/0092-6566(90)90022-X · DOI
  50. Trigg A., 2001, ‘Veblen, Bourdieu, and conspicuous consumption’, Journal of Economic Issues, 99, 10.1080/00213624.2001.11506342 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1086/209185 · DOI
  52. Underwood E., 1994, ‘Luxury's tide turns’, Brandweek, 35, 18
  53. Veblen T., 1934, The Theory of the Leisure Class
  54. 10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00023-9 · DOI
  55. Wold H., 1981, Evaluation of Econometric Models
  56. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199808)15:5<423::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
  57. Zinkhan G., 1994, ‘Good life images and brand name associations: Evidence from Asia, America and Europe’, Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 496

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Cass, A., & McEwen, H.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Venue
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
25-39
ISSN
  • 1472-0817 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-1838
OpenAlex
W2030580389
Cited by
936
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 36
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Keywords
status consumption, conspicuous consumption, consumer status, gender differences, self-monitoring, interpersonal influence, young consumers, brand perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review