Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption
Abstract
In seeking to expand an understanding of consumption, this study assesses the relationship between status consumption and conspicuous consumption. Theoretically, the relationship between status consumption and conspicuous consumption is problematic and, therefore, the main focus of this paper examines the theoretical and empirical separation of consumers' status consumption and conspicuous consumption. Data were gathered via a survey of individuals aged between 18 and 25. The findings indicate that status consumption and conspicuous consumption are distinct constructs. Differences in status consumption tendencies between males and females were not found; however, in relation to conspicuous consumption gender differences were found. Status consumption was affected by self‐monitoring and interpersonal influences, but conspicuous consumption was affected only by interpersonal influences. The brands examined also clearly differed in terms of status and conspicuous consumption perceptions. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interpersonal influence can affect conspicuous consumption.
“Previous studies suggest that conspicuous consumption is an important component of materialism and is related to luxury consumption (Wu et al., 2017), the reasons for conspicuous consumption include the desire for uniqueness, attracting attention, and luxury (Griskevicius & Kenrick, 2013), interpersonal influence can affect conspicuous consumption (Vigneron & Johnson, 1999), and consumers with low”
From The Moderating Role of Self-Concept Clarity in the Relationship between Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence and Conspicuous Consumption (2026) · cites this paper as O'Cass & McEwen, 2004
Susceptibility to interpersonal influence is positively associated with conspicuous consumption (r=.607, p=.001).
“There was a positive, significant, and strong (r=.607)relationship between susceptibility to interpersonal influence and conspicuous consumption.”
From The Moderating Role of Self-Concept Clarity in the Relationship between Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence and Conspicuous Consumption (2026) · cites this paper as O 'Cass & McEwen, 2004
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.1108/10610429810216874 · DOI
- Bagwell L. S., 1996, ‘Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption’, The American Economic Review, 86, 349
- Bansanko D., 1995, ‘The kinder, gentler, richer American’, American Demographics, 17, 46
- 10.1086/209186 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/10610429810222831 · DOI
- Belk R. W., 1978, ‘Assessing the effects of visible consumption patterns on impression formation’, Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 39
- Bell S. S., 1991, ‘Combining esthetic and social value to explain preferences for product styles with incorporation of personality and ensemble effects’, in ‘To Have Possessions: A Handbook on Ownership and Property’, Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 6, 243
- 10.1086/261957 · DOI
- Bourdieu P., 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste
- Calder B. J., 1981, ‘Designing research for application’, Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 197, 10.1086/208856 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1300/J050v07n04_02 · DOI
- Converse J.andPresser S.(1986)‘Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardised questionnaire’ Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Sage Publications Beverly Hills CA.
- Dittmar H., 1992, The Social Psychology of Material Possessions
- 10.1108/eb008208 · DOI
- 10.1080/10696679.1997.11501750 · DOI
- 10.1080/10696679.1999.11501839 · DOI
- Echikson W., 1994, ‘The return of luxury’, Fortune, 130
- 10.1086/208679 · DOI
- Ferstman C., 1992, ‘Social status, culture and economic performance’
- 10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00057-5 · DOI
- Fornell C., 1994, Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, 58
- 10.2307/1251326 · DOI
- Goldsmith R., 1996, Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Proceedings, 309
- 10.1108/10610429910257904 · DOI
- Gould S., 1993, ‘Assessing self‐concept discrepancy in consumer behavior: The joint effect of private self‐consciousness and self‐monitoring’, Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 419
- 10.1080/00224545.1988.9713756 · DOI
- Holman R., 1981, Review of Marketing, 106
- Kairser S. B., 1990, The Social Psychology of Apparel
- Kelly R. F., 1987, Advances in Nonprofit Marketing, 1
- Kilsheimer J.(1993)Status Consumption: The Development and Implications of a Scale Measuring the Motivation to Consume for Status a dissertation submitted to the Marketing Faculty at Florida State University FL.
- Levine J., 1997, ‘Badass sells’, Forbes
- 10.1108/10610420110388672 · DOI
- Lurie A., 1981, The Language of Clothes
- 10.1300/J046v09n04_02 · DOI
- Mason R., 1981, Conspicuous Consumption: A Study of Exceptional Consumer Behaviour
- Mason R., 1992, Modeling the Demand for Status Goods
- McCraken G., 1988, Culture and Consumption
- 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200005)17:5<397::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
- 10.1016/S1441-3582(01)70166-8 · DOI
- O'Shaughnessy J., 1992, Explaining Buyer Behaviour, 10.1093/oso/9780195071085.001.0001 · DOI
- Packard V., 1959, The Status Seekers
- 10.2307/2956866 · DOI
- 10.1300/J054v06n01_02 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8616.00085 · DOI
- Ram J., 1994, ‘Luxury goods firms find a haven in Asia’, Asian Business, 30, 52
- Shermach K., 1997, ‘What consumers wish brand managers knew’, Marketing News, 31
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60260-9 · DOI
- 10.1086/208971 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(90)90022-X · DOI
- Trigg A., 2001, ‘Veblen, Bourdieu, and conspicuous consumption’, Journal of Economic Issues, 99, 10.1080/00213624.2001.11506342 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/209185 · DOI
- Underwood E., 1994, ‘Luxury's tide turns’, Brandweek, 35, 18
- Veblen T., 1934, The Theory of the Leisure Class
- 10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00023-9 · DOI
- Wold H., 1981, Evaluation of Econometric Models
- 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199808)15:5<423::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
- Zinkhan G., 1994, ‘Good life images and brand name associations: Evidence from Asia, America and Europe’, Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 496
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hou, F., Guan, Z., Li, B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2019) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-04-2018-0177 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Sustainable clothing: Why conspicuous consumption and greenwashing matter
Apaolaza, V., Policarpo, M. C., Hartmann, P., Paredes, M. R., & D'Souza, C. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3335 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
McCarthy, B., Kapetanaki, A. B., & Wang, P. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120435 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Bharti, M., Suneja, V., & Bharti, M. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111215 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The thrill of victory: women and sport shopping.
O’Donnell, K. A., Strebel, J., & Mortimer, G. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.10.005 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Salinas-Maceda, V. (2026) · Fashion, Style & Popular Culture · doi:10.1386/fspc_00381_1
(2026) · International Journal of Marketing, Communication and New Media · doi:10.54663/2182-9306.2026.v.14.n.26.204-227
- Authors
- O'Cass, A., & McEwen, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Behaviour
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-39
- ISSN
- 1472-0817 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-1838
- OpenAlex
- W2030580389
- Cited by
- 936
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 10.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- status consumption, conspicuous consumption, consumer status, gender differences, self-monitoring, interpersonal influence, young consumers, brand perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review