Cited by 2Food composition and propertiesSeed and Plant BiochemistryFood and Agricultural Sciences

Incorporating Whole Pulse Flour from Cowpea, Navy Bean, and Red Bean in Whole Wheat Flour Bread

Rajpurohit, Bipin, Tilley, Michael, Wu, Xiaorong, Li, Yonghui·2025·Cereal Chemistry

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives In recent years there has been an increase in consumption of pulse ingredients due to their availability, sustainability, and nutritional value. There is great potential to incorporate whole pulse flour in whole wheat bread to increase the protein content and enhance the amino acid profile. This study investigated the effects of incorporating different levels (5%, 10%, and 15%) of whole pulse flour from red bean, navy bean, and cowpea on the quality of whole wheat bread. Findings In general, incorporation of pulses increased the protein content and water‐holding capacity of the composite flours with a statistically significant increase in protein content for all levels of navy bean flour and 15% cowpea flour. Within each pulse type, increasing the level of incorporation decreased the dough strength and the water absorption for optimum dough consistency. All the pulse types and levels decreased the specific loaf volume except for 5% navy bean incorporation. Incorporation of whole red bean flour and whole navy bean flour up to 10% and cowpea up to 5% did not significantly affect the hardness and springiness of the bread. Sensory analysis of whole wheat bread prepared with the various treatments of whole navy bean flour showed overall acceptability similar to the control bread for all levels of incorporation. Conclusion Overall, whole navy bean flour substitution up to 10% was found to be most favorable with least deleterious effects on bread loaf volume, texture, and sensory attributes and the potential to make the bread crumb color lighter. Significance and Novelty Our study found that substituting up to 10% of commercial whole wheat flour with whole navy bean flour was more favorable. This substitution has the potential to increase protein content and crumb lightness, while having the least negative effect on bread quality, and overall sensory acceptability similar to control bread.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cche.70018

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Rajpurohit, B., Tilley, M., Wu, X., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • Center for Grain and Animal Health Research (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Yonghui
Venue
Cereal Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-10-23
Volume
102
Issue
6
Pages
1059-1067
ISSN
  • 0009-0352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3638
OpenAlex
W4415461579
Cited by
2
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cereal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
whole wheat bread, cowpea flour, red bean flour, flour substitution, bread quality, protein content, water holding capacity, dough strength, bread volume, bread texture, sensory acceptability, crumb color, amino acid composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review