CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Affect in daily career decision self-efficacy and career choice anxiety

Park, In‐Jo, Lee, Junehee, Kim, Minhee, Kim, Ji‐Yeon, Jahng, Seungmin·2019·The Career Development Quarterly
DOI 10.1002/cdq.12201
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors investigated the impact of emotional intelligence on 2 career decision variables: daily career decision self‐efficacy and daily career choice anxiety. They also examined the mediating effects of daily positive affect on these variables. At baseline, 103 Korean undergraduate and graduate students completed questionnaires about emotional intelligence. Using a daily diary method, the authors also collected data on participants’ daily positive affect, daily career decision self‐efficacy, and daily career choice anxiety for 21 consecutive days. Hierarchical linear model analyses indicated that emotional intelligence predicted daily career decision self‐efficacy and daily career choice anxiety. These findings suggest that fostering emotional intelligence and daily positive affect could help students determine their future career. For individuals experiencing difficulty in the career decision process, counselors may foster career decision self‐efficacy and reduced career choice anxiety via enhancing clients’ emotional intelligence and daily positive affect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cdq.12201

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1177/106907279600400103 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb01004.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1177/1069072703255834 · DOI
  5. Bryk A., 2000, Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with HLM5 programs
  6. 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2011.tb00071.x · DOI
  7. 10.1177/1069072707313189 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/j.2161-1920.2014.00037.x · DOI
  9. Cohen S., 1988, The social psychology of health: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology, 31
  10. 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.001 · DOI
  11. Dahl A. D., 2008, The relationship between negative career thoughts and emotional intelligence, Canadian Journal of Career Development, 7, 4
  12. 10.1177/1069072712448893 · DOI
  13. 10.2224/sbp.2008.36.3.315 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.012 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/1069072712454698 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/j.2161-1920.2012.00012.x · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.026 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/1069072703011002003 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fritzsche B. A., 2005, Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work, 180
  21. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.011 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/0022-0167.53.4.397 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.001 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.49 · DOI
  25. Hahn J.(2014).Influence of supervisor’s emotional intelligence on subordinate’s attitude and task performance(Master’s thesis). Gwangyun University Seoul South Korea.
  26. 10.1177/1069072710395536 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00066.x · DOI
  28. Isen A. M., 1984, Handbook of social cognition, 179
  29. Isen A. M., 2003, A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology, 179, 10.1037/10566-013 · DOI
  30. 10.1521/soco.1983.2.1.18 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1002/joec.12026 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.745 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.04.010 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.006 · DOI
  35. 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.262 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/1069072706286446 · DOI
  37. Lee E.(2001).A study on the effect of self‐efficacy upon the career development(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ewha University Seoul South Korea.
  38. 10.1002/j.2161-1920.2005.tb01088.x · DOI
  39. 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00016-1 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494 · DOI
  42. 10.5539/ies.v4n3p31 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00215-X · DOI
  44. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01754 · DOI
  45. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00514 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1177/1069072710385545 · DOI
  47. Reis H. T., 2000, Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology
  48. 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1177/1069072708318900 · DOI
  50. 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1037/per0000202 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00076-9 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.06.005 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1 · DOI
  56. 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00311 · DOI
  57. 10.1177/1094428108327450 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Park, I., Lee, J., Kim, M., Kim, J., & Jahng, S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology Henan University Henan People’s Republic of China
  • Department of Psychology Gyeongsang National University Jinju South Korea
  • Korean Counseling Graduate University Seoul South Korea
  • Department of Sport Education Kookmin University Seoul South Korea
  • Department of Psychology Sungkyunkwan University Seoul South Korea
Venue
The Career Development Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
313-326
ISSN
  • 0889-4019
  • 2161-0045
DOI
10.1002/cdq.12201
Cited by
26
References
4
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review